Paul Krugman on Why the Failure of the Super-Committee is Good – NY Times

I am not an economist, and so I find myself waiting to read Paul Krugman in The NY Times to explain what is occurring in the economy, the pluses and minuses of the positions of Democrats and Republicans in their respective proscriptions and values, and the role of journalists.

This piece on why Krugman believes the Congressional Super-Committee of 6 Republicans and 6 Democrats will fail in its mission is worthwhile reading (NY Times, November 17). It describes the issues at stake, the different universes and values of the two major political parties, and how journalists so often fail in writing about the motivations and consequences of policies out of fear of being accused of partisanship on the one hand and of losing access to policy-makers on the other because they ask the hard questions and then report the answers with appropriate critical analysis.

Why I Declined to be on the Host Committee for AIPAC in Los Angeles

I was invited to become a member of the Host Committee for a Gala Fundraising event sponsored by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee in Los Angeles in February, 2012. I have declined the invitation, with a heavy heart, and when the Southern Pacific Synagogue Initiative Director of AIPAC invited me to speak with him about why, I wrote this letter and welcomed a follow-up conversation with him. I wanted you to see an edited version of that letter.

Dear Judah:

I welcome the opportunity to meet and begin a conversation with you. Thank you for the offer and outreach.

By way of introduction, my involvement with AIPAC goes back to the 1980s. I was very friendly with Tom Dine (one of the first Executive Directors of AIPAC) who was a congregant when I served at Washington Hebrew Congregation in D.C. in the mid-80s. I have always been respectful and appreciative of AIPAC and its multitude of contributions to the security of the State of Israel through its advocacy in Washington.

One issue for me which keeps me from signing on as a member of the host committee is that too many people involved with AIPAC have become intolerant of American Jewish diversity and uncritical of Israel’s government policies that are undemocratic and reflective of extremist nationalism. For AIPAC (and for that matter, for any pro-Israel Jewish organization) to say nothing is essentially to give tacit support to those undemocratic forces within the government and Israeli society that run counter to the principles articulated in Israel’s own Declaration of Independence calling for a just, democratic society that includes all citizens of the Jewish State.

That is not the only difficulty I have, however. The refusal of AIPAC leadership to meet with J Street leadership, to join together as two pro-Israel organizations when there is consensus on a particular issue, or even to enter into a public debate with J Street President Jeremy ben-Ami about the differences between AIPAC and J Street in their respective approaches to American Jewish politics in Washington, D.C. vis a vis Israel does not serve the cause of Israel as a vital democracy and adds fuel to the flames of many Republican leaders in Congress and their Jewish pro-Israel supporters who seek to make Israel a wedge issue in American politics for political gain. This has never before happened in the 63 year history of the State of Israel vis a vis the American Jewish community.

I believe AIPAC could do much to change this negative and divisive atmosphere by addressing these undemocratic and intolerant trends directly and publicly, but it declines to do so. Remaining quiet is not good for Israel or for the American Jewish community.

Having said this, please understand my own Zionist and pro-Israel background and thinking. I am a national Vice President of the Association of Reform Zionists of America (ARZA), supportive of the Israel Movement for Progressive Judaism (IMPJ), am a member of the Advisory Board of the Daniels Center of Tel Aviv, and have assisted as a congregational rabbi at my own synagogue in helping our Israeli Reform brothers and sisters build two Reform synagogue centers in Israel (Kehillat Mevasseret Zion and Congregation Darchei Noam in Ramat Hasharon). I take missions of my congregants to Israel every two or three years. My synagogue Day School has a 3 year exchange program with the Tzahalah Elementary School (in north Tel Aviv) as part of the LA-Tel Aviv partnership. I have raised millions of dollars for State of Israel Bonds. And I am an active member of the Rabbinic Cabinet of J Street, though I have not always agreed with every position that J Street has taken.

J Street, in my view, is essentially correct in its approach to Congress and Israel, that we American Jews have both a duty to support Israel as a pluralistic democracy that champions human rights and civil liberties, as well as supporting all efforts that will bring about an end-of-conflict solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict that results in two-states for two-peoples living side by side in peace and security. I agree with J Street’s position, as well, that pro-Israel American Jewish supporters must be free to criticize Israel’s government (arguably the most right-wing extremist government in the history of the Jewish State) without fear of being placed in cherem (excommunication and pariah status) when it acts in ways that we, as American Zionists and lovers of the Jewish State, believe do not support a peaceful and secure two-state resolution and compromise with the Palestinians.

If you are interested, please read my Rosh Hashanah morning sermon this past High Holiday season which is posted on my synagogue’s web-site (www.tioh.org) to learn what is behind my thinking about Israel, her security and liberal Zionist values.

This is why I have declined to be an active supporter of AIPAC, though again, I am grateful and appreciative of AIPAC for its many years of past advocacy for Israel in our nation’s capital. If you feel comfortable I ask that you share this letter with AIPAC leadership in Washington, D.C.

L’shalom,

Rabbi John Rosove

Isaac and Rebekah – a poem for Parashat Chayei Sarah

My father Abraham set out alone, / leaving everything he knew, / seeking a better place / where he’d never been / because God promised him / blessing and the future.

I am in mourning / ever since my mother died / after my father stole me away / before dawn / while she slept / to slay me / and destroy his blessing / and my future.

When she awoke / her servants told her / that he placed me upon the pyre / as a burnt-offering / to his God.

An angel stayed his hand, / but my mother never knew / so she died / with a broken heart.

How she loved me, / filling me up as a goblet / with her tears and laughter.

And now I am alone, quiet / amidst the wheat and rocks, / beneath the sun / and stirred-up clouds / swirling like disturbed angels.

Can You hear me / O merciless God? / Bend Your world, if You do / and reverse time / that my mother / may be here with me / and we be / as we were.

…Looking up / a camel caravan – / the people appear / as tiny sticks stuck / in sand / in desert heat-waves-dancing.

There is my father’s servant Eliezer / and a young girl / growing larger / before my eyes.

-Lasuach basadeh- / I pray and weep / beneath this sun / and swirling clouds.

Rebekah to Eliezer: / ‘Who is that man / crying there / in the field?’

‘He is my master Isaac, / your intended one, / whose seed you will carry forward / as God promised his father.’

-Vatipol min hagamal- / She alighted from her camel / and veiled herself / for she understood / that this was her wedding day.

I entered her / in my mother’s tent, / and she comforted me.

Herman Cain’s Character Problem

According to Herman Cain he has never done anything wrong for which he feels ashamed, which in light of the four women who have charged him with inappropriate sexual predatory behavior against them, reminds me of something my late mother in-law, Edith Wahl, taught her three daughters: “If you seem to be having a problem with everyone around you, the problem isn’t them – it’s you!”

On the subject of character, here are four statements that Mr. Cain might use to measure his own character:

“The best index to a person’s character is (a) how he treats people who can’t do him any good (Samuel Johnson, lexicographer), and (b) how he treats people who can’t fight back.” (Abigail van Buren, advice columnist)

“If you want to see what a person is made of, see how he behaves in a position of authority. (Yugoslavian folk saying)

“The measure of a person’s character is what he would do if he knew he would never be found out.” (Thomas Macauley, historian)

“What you are thunders so loudly that I cannot hear what you say to the contrary.” (Ralph Waldo Emerson)

The Dogs of War? Will the US and NATO Attack Iranian Nuclear Sites in the Next Year?

This may be nothing more than speculation, but this piece from Aryeh Sullivan of Media Line is worth reading. Aryeh is a veteran newsman with particular expertise on the Middle East who I met last year in Israel. He escorted my Temple Leadership Mission to Bethlehem to meet with the head of Ma’an, the Palestine News Agency.

WEST, NOT ISRAEL, LIKELY TO STRIKE AT IRAN

http://www.themedialine.org/news/news_detail.asp?NewsID=33697

A Child Molestation Victim Reflects on Her Own Trauma in the Wake of the Penn State Scandal – Huffington Post

Dani Klein Modisett is a friend and a congregant. Professionally, she is a writer, actress and stand-up-comic. She is also a loving wife and mother. Dani gave me permission to post her article (link is below) on my blog.

Dani was a child molestation victim at the age of 8. Now 47, she reflects in The Huffington Post on the Penn State University scandal involving the molestation of at least 40 children by the former Assistant Football Coach Jerry Sandusky between 1994 and 2008.

As the ongoing investigation has now revealed, Head Coach Joe Paterno, the beloved University personality and Penn State icon who made “Success with Honor” the University’s mantra, knew (along with others) about Sandusky’s predatory behavior, but neither he nor anyone reported it to the police or took action of any kind against Sandusky on behalf of the children he abused or the University that employed him.

Edmund Burke’s warning bears repeating: “All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing.”

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dani-klein-modisett/joe-paterno_b_1087477.html

Temple Israel’s Fine Judaica Collection

In the last year our Executive Director, Bill Shpall, with the help of our archivist Enid Sperber and our appraiser Jack Roth, have led the way in cataloging all the fine art that Temple Israel of Hollywood has collected over the last 85 years since its founding in 1926. It is an extraordinary collection of fine Judaica, manuscripts, paintings, woodcuts, etchings, lithographs, photographs, sculpture, ancient pottery and glass, silver and gold ceremonial art, bronze, marble, calligraphy, books, and textiles.

Here are a few of many gems – 8 Seriographs by Ben Shahn of the infamous Dreyfus Affair of 1894; a first edition of Der Judenstaadt (The Jewish State) by Theodor Herzl, 1896; an original oil painting and 4 lithographs by one of Israel’s great artists, Reuven Rubin; original lithographs signed by Marc Chagall, and Israeli pioneer artists Jacob Steinhardt and Moshe Castel; a signed letter of Henrietta Szold (1916); a remnant of the Cairo Genizah; a Prayer Book published in Livorno dated 1801 with a letter in the hand of Sir Moses Montefiore; many antiquities of Holy Land glass, bronze and pottery dating from 1600 B.C.E. to 700 C.E.; an embroidered velvet Readers Desk Cover from the now destroyed synagogue of Alzenau, Germany, 1827; a Polish copper tz’dakah box circa 1900, an exquisite silver Torah Crown from Amsterdam, late 19th century; 2 silver and gold Torah breast plates from the famed Lazarus Posen silversmiths of Frankfurt and Berlin, mid-19th century; 2 wooden Torah cases covered in silver and red velvet from Syria and Iraq, 19th century; several exquisite silver Megilah holders with illuminated manuscripts from Germany and Iran, 19th and 20th centuries; signed photographs by Israeli photo-journalist Micha Bar-Am; hand-woven linen tapestries featuring the tallit and a redesigned interior of our Sanctuary Ark with Torah mantles by American artist, Laurie Gross; a bronze cast Menorah by Salvadore Dali; and a bronze cast wall hanging of Moses Descending Sinai by Mary Ann Devine (a 2nd cast is at Hillside Memorial Park).

All this and much more are shown in a beautiful catalog and is a precious legacy of our community.

John Updike once wrote that “The artist brings something into the world that did not exist before, and he/she does it without destroying something else.” So true, and thank God for the artists among us!

30 Second Wall Street Ad – David Sauvage on MSNBC

David Sauvage is a young man (pushing 30) who I’ve known since he was a kid and I consider a friend. He is smart and principled, is a play-write and a documentary film-maker (like his Dad, award winning Pierre Sauvage). David appeared in the last couple of days on MSNBC and talked about the Wall Street Protests and his 30-second Wall Street ad that has gone viral. I am proud of David and recommend your watching. http://ow.ly/7mbGV

Abraham’s Last Test – Did He Pass or Fail? D’var Torah Vayera

In our post-World War II world there is no aspect of the story of the Akedah (the Binding of Isaac) that is not jarring and disturbing. We ask, how could any father agree to slay his own son on God’s command and claim this as essential to faith?

This Torah portion (Vayera) confronts our relationship with God as none other in our tradition. In this age of skepticism, doubt and tentative belief we ask what kind of a human being was Abraham who was prepared to kill his son? Did Abraham “hear” God correctly, and if so, could any of us have said “Hineni” (Here I am) as Abraham did when God called him to demonstrate how far his faith would take him?

The mystics tell us that Abraham’s willingness to do God’s will reflects an ideal man of faith, that there are times when (per Kierkegaard) we have to suspend the ethical and nullify completely the individual ego, even if it means destroying everything we love and our future. The 20th century Israeli scholar and thinker Yeshayahu Liebowitz has written that we are not supposed to extract an ethical message from Abraham’s behavior. In effect, he says, human beings are not commanded by the Torah to be ethical; they are commanded to serve God!

I wonder. My understanding of the Torah and prophetic traditions is that a covenant of justice and compassion is what God requires of us, not heartless self-destruction.

The key Hebrew command relative to Abraham’s near slaughter of his son reads: Kach na et bin’cha, et y’chid’cha, asher a-hav’ta et Yitzchak v’lech l’cha el eretz ha-Moriah v’ha-a-le-hu sham l’olah al echad he-harim asher omar elecha (“God said, ‘Take your son, your only one, the one you love, Isaac, and go to the land of Moriah. Offer him there as a burnt-offering, on one of the mountains that I will show you.” (Genesis 22:2).

One midrash says that Abraham’s understanding of the event was wrong from the start and based on a mistaken perception of the original order. Abraham should have tried to find out, the midrash argues, what God wanted of him and not do anything until he was certain about what he was being asked to do.

Rashi explained that Abraham did not, in fact, understand God’s words and command. God didn’t say “slaughter your son – v’tish’chat et bin’cha.” He said, “Lift up your son to the service of God – v’ha-a-le-hu sham l’olah.

Yes, the word “olah” can be rendered as a burnt offering; but it literally means “that which is lifted up.”

Recall Kunte Kinte from the 1977 TV Mini-Series “Roots” as he, following his tribal custom, took his son to the top of a mountain and lifted him in thanksgiving and dedication to the spirit world. Recall, as well, “The Lion King” doing the same by presenting his son and future King to his spiritual relatives among the stars.

In the Genesis story, just as Abraham lifted the knife to slay his son God sent the angel rather than speak directly to Abraham to stay his hand. God never spoke to Abraham again. Was God devastated by Abraham’s mishearing of his call to dedicate his son? Did Abraham fail that tenth and most crucial final test of faith? Did Abraham really understand the meaning of the Divine-human partnership?

The end of the story is clear. God did not want human sacrifice and we do not have to give up our humanity to serve God. What Abraham did earlier at Sodom and Gomorrah and what Moses did at the sin of the Golden Calf – namely, challenge God to live up to God’s own standards of justice and compassion – that is the lesson of the Biblical tradition. That is our Jewish legacy!

Shabbat shalom.