What should we think or do about Mel Gibson?

When news hit several weeks ago that Mel Gibson is working on a new movie project about the Maccabees, I thought “O boy – here we go again!”

Given Mel’s penchant for bloody and gory stories, the Jewish civil war that raged 2175 years ago in the Judean hills between the extreme Hellenized Jews and the traditional Jewish priestly class (i.e. the Hasmoneans) seems a natural for him. A film-maker of Gibson’s abilities and notoriety will probably net him and everyone associated with the film a fortune, not that he needs the money!

Already, Jews are worrying. Given Gibson’s offensive track record concerning Jews (e.g. the anti-Semitic “Passion of the Christ”, his drunken anti-Semitic rant on the PCH and his father’s anti-Vatican II and philo-Nazi sentiments), we have come out of the woodwork to comment – me included.

What can we expect in Gibson’s treatment of our uniquely Jewish story of Judah Maccabee and the Maccabean Wars? Will he distort the history beyond recognition? Will he cast the story in a self-serving way that characterizes Jews, ancient and modern, using negative stereotypes? We can’t know at this point as no one has seen a script, and we can only hope for the best.

A more immediate question: Is Mel Gibson an anti-Semite? His history suggests that he is, but I’m not so sure. Though it’s usually true that if a creature looks like a duck, walks like a duck and talks like a duck, it’s a duck, I have questions about what Gibson really believes and feels about Judaism and the Jewish people based on what people who know him say about him.

My friend, Alan Nierob, is one of Gibson’s chief public defenders. Alan is Gibson’s long-time publicist and so, understandably, it is his job to manage Gibson’s image, but Alan also considers Gibson a friend and has told me for years that Gibson is not an anti-Semite. Alan is a child of Holocaust survivors, and I would think that if he believed Gibson were anti-Semitic, he would fire him just as Ari Emanuel did immediately after Gibson’s long-time agent died this past year.

I am also cautious to characterize Gibson as an anti-Semite because Rabbi Irwin Kula, President of Clal, The National Jewish Center for Learning and Leadership based in New York, is consulting with Gibson about the Maccabee movie. I can’t imagine that Rabbi Kula would do so if he thought Gibson were an anti-Semite.

This past week The LA Jewish Journal featured a substantial four-column expose, “Could Gibson Be Good for the Maccabees?” (written by Danielle Berrin) on Gibson and the run-up to this movie. It is an excellent piece that addresses all the relevant issues, interviews Gibson’s friends and foes as well as a number of Jewish leaders. It is worth reading (see below).

In the meantime, though Gibson has not asked the Jewish community for forgiveness for his past misdeeds and insensitivity to our tradition and people (note: without a sincere request for s’lichah – forgiveness, we are under no obligation to forgive), we need to remember that forgiveness is more about us than about the person who hurt us. To continue to nurture the wounds inflicted upon us long ago gives ultimate victory to the perpetrator. On that basis alone, it is best that we (regardless of what the other says or does) move on, live our lives forward, not bother ourselves overly much with who Gibson is or isn’t, and wait to see what comes of his project.

L’shanah tovah u-m’tukah!

http://www.jewishjournal.com/hollywoodjew/item/could_gibson_be_good_for_the_maccabees_20110921/

Jeremy Ben-Ami on Stephen Colbert Last Night – Brilliant

Last night on the Colbert Nation Jeremy Ben-Ami, the President and Founder of J Street, a pro-Israel pro-peace political organization in Washington, D.C. appeared to discuss with Colbert the UN Palestinian State resolution and the complex situation in which Israel, the Palestinians, the UN, and the US find themselves. Stephen Colbert was superb, brilliant, well-informed, and funny – as always. Jeremy can always be counted on to deliver, and he did so in his customary grace, warmth, vision, and intelligence. It was a great segment, and I recommend you watch it and pass this around. Here is the link.

http://www.colbertnation.com/full-episodes/thu-september-22-2011-jeremy-ben-ami

Check my book recommendations on Jeremy’s book.

Forgiveness – S’lichot is This Saturday Night

A better description of forgiveness follows that I have not seen anywhere else. I am grateful to my friend, Rabbi Sharon Brous, for passing it along to me.

As we formally begin the High Holiday season this Motzei Shabbat (Saturday night) with the service of S’lichot (meaning – “forgiveness”), Jonathan Sacks offers us a way to think and be as we enter this season.

For those of you in Los Angeles, our synagogue’s “Sl’ichot in White” commences at 9 PM with a pre-service Oneg followed by Havdalah, and offerings of poetry, song, brief divrei Torah, reflections, and a service in which we formally change the regular Torah mantles to the gorgeous and stunning white mantles created for us 20 years ago by artist Laurie Gross for the High Holidays. We will conclude with the blast (t’kiyah g’dolah) of the shofar. My colleagues, Rabbi Michelle Missaghieh, Rabbi Jocee Hudson, Chazzan Danny Maseng, our Executive Director, Bill Shpall, our staff and leadership at TIOH welcome you.

“Forgiveness is more than a technique of conflict resolution. It is a stunningly original strategy. In a world without forgiveness, evil begets evil, harm generates harm, and there is no way short of exhaustion or forgetfulness of breaking the sequence. Forgiveness breaks the chain. It introduces into the logic of interpersonal encounter the unpredictability of grace. It represents a decision not to do what instinct and passion urge us to do. It answers hate with a refusal to hate, animosity with generosity. Few more daring ideas have ever entered the human situation. Forgiveness means that we are not destined endlessly to replay the grievances of yesterday. It is the ability to live with the past without being held captive by the past. It would not be an exaggeration to say that forgiveness is the most compelling testimony to human freedom. It is about the action that is not reaction. It is the refusal to be defined by circumstance. It represents our ability to change course, reframe the narrative of the past and create an unexpected set of possibilities for the future… Indeed there is none so self-righteous as one who carries the burden of self-perceived victimhood. But it is ultimately dehumanizing. More than hate destroys the hated, it destroys the hater.”

-Rabbi Jonathan Sacks, Dignity of Difference, pps. 178-9

 

Tsuris in New York Magazine – A superb discussion of Obama and Netanyahu

I highly recommend this outstanding piece in New York Magazine on Obama’s strong support of Israel since before his presidency and his and his administration’s troubled relationship with PM Netanyahu. This writer tells it as it really is, credits Obama with being a strong friend and ally to Israel, and a president who has been courageous in advocating a settlement to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The article truthfully and effectively dresses down Bibi in a way that has long been over due. The article is honest about the mistakes and political miscalculations Obama has made and the failure of his own hasbara on what he has done to pressure both Israel and the Palestinians in the last 2 years. Obama’s record on Israel speaks for itself and his speech today in the UN was as good for Jews as we could ever hope for. In light of this speech the article gives important context.

http://www.thefivetowns.info/news-latest/25456-ny-magazine-the-tsuris-obama-is-the-best-thing-israel-has-going-for-it-right-now-.html

The Bullies Among Us

At my synagogue, in our schools, in Congress, in the Israeli government, in the international arena generally, I have become increasingly cognizant of the phenomenon of bullying and the toll that it takes on individuals, culture and society as a whole.

Bullies are interested in one thing and one thing alone – power, and however they dress it up, it is only about power, self-aggrandizement and gaining control over anyone and everyone around them that they seek. Bullies are impressed by no one except those who bully them back, and unless we stand up to them they will destroy everything that is good around us.

My synagogue schools have a zero-tolerance policy about bullies. We will work with kids who display these tendencies because we are a religious and educational institution with a heart and a mission to transform lives. But we will not sacrifice any child to the bully, and we will remove bullies from the student population if necessary. The same is true for adult congregants who think that the synagogue is there to serve them alone, and that policies and practices must accommodate their needs, or else. As the senior rabbi, I have come across such individuals on occasion, though the culture of Temple Israel doesn’t lend itself to bullies going about their ways unchecked, and it has taken me many years to finally say to myself, to my staff and leadership that there are some people we just cannot afford to keep as members.

Bullies, of course, also display qualities that draw others to them. They are often clever people, charismatic, intelligent, gifted, and well-spoken. Like Korach of the Bible, they are adept at manipulating symbols and people for their purposes and use populist language and democratic principles as a foil over their under-handed intentions. They often operate in the shadows, confuse the ethical principle of maintaining confidentiality with sustaining a “cone of silence.” They are abusers, first and foremost, and though they may seem genteel, professional, reasonable, and measured, let no one be fooled.

I normally would not name names as an ethical principle, but with regards to what is happening in Washington, D.C. and the Knesset, I believe we should call out those who systematically abuse the public trust and who are causing tremendous damage to our society here in America and to the Jewish State. So many of our leaders are bullies, and to remain silent cannot be an option, recalling Heschel’s admonition that “some are guilty, but all are responsible.”

House Speaker John Boehner and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, whether bullies themselves or captive of bullies such as anti-tax demagogue Grover Norquist, Presidential candidates Michelle Bachman and Rick Perry, among others, are among the worst offenders. They are joined by former President George W. Bush, Vice-President Dick Cheney, would-be-presidential candidate Sarah Palin, and so-called commentators Glenn Beck, Bill O’Reilly, and Sean Hannity in their self-serving demagoguery.

We have bullies on the liberal side too, but they pale in significance to the cacophony that we hear constantly from the right. Together, they and people like them have caused irreparable damage to the United States, to civil discourse and to commitment to truth, and I am waiting for some of our most decent political leaders to call them out as they really are.

In Israel, too, our people has its share of bullies led first and foremost by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu who, like most bullies, is impressed by nothing other than another bully who isn’t hesitant to push back. He has disrespected both the President and Vice-President of the United States, the most important friends and allies the Jewish State has on the planet, because he believed from day one that President Obama could be rolled and he has been proven correct. Netanyahu has been joined by fellow bullies Yisrael Bateinu leader and Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, Likud Knesset member Danny Danon and most of the right-wing settler movement along with many in the Orthodox parties in turning Israel into a pariah nation and isolating her in a way we have not seen in 63 years of statehood.

It’s time for decent people to call out bullies wherever they are and whenever they rear their heads! Bullies are allowed to do their dirty work when the rest of us remain silent. For the sake of sanity and decency, we need to be vigilant everywhere, or everything we cherish and value will be lost.

On Good and Evil – an Elul Reflection

If only there were evil people somewhere insidiously committing evil deeds and it were necessary only to separate them from the rest of us and destroy them. But the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?

-Alexander Solzhenitsyn, novelist, Nobel laureate (1918-2008)

A Chassidic approach to sin, repentance and atonement

A disciple confessed to the sage: “I try so hard to atone. I try to wrestle with temptation. I try but I do not succeed. I remain mired in the mud of transgression. Help me to extricate myself from sin and to truly repent.” The Sage answered, “Perhaps, my dear friend, you are thinking only of yourself.  How about forgetting yourself and thinking of the world?” (Martin Buber, Hasidism and Modern Man, p. 162)

Encountering Peace – the View from Cairo – by Gershon Baskin

If you are interested in what the Egyptian street really thinks relative to Israel and by extension the rest of the Arab world including Turkey, Gershon Baskin’s piece from The Jerusalem Post is revealing. Thanks to Rabbi Leonard Beerman for sending this to me.

Since Friday I have been in Cairo. This great city is not unfamiliar to me – I’ve been here more than 20 times, although my last visit was five years ago. I came to Cairo to attend a small meeting of MECA – the Middle East Citizens Assembly. This small but important organization was founded by Walid Salem, a Palestinian peace and democracy activist from east Jerusalem who decided that for real democracy to take root in the Arab world, citizens needed to take responsibility, stop acting like subjects and become active participants. Walid succeeded in creating a network of democracy activists from all over the Middle East including Egypt, Libya, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Syria, Jordan, Morocco, Tunisia, Turkey, Iran, Palestine, Israel and more.Walid has consistently demanded that Israelis be included at every meeting. I was privy to an email correspondence between Walid, other members of MECA and a new Libyan participant, in which the Libyan said he wouldn’t participate in any meeting that included Israelis. Walid and other Arab members told him directly that while it was certainly his right to boycott Israelis, MECA was a inclusive forum for all citizens of the Middle East, including Israelis.. Six or seven Israelis had been scheduled to attend the Cairo meetings, but canceled due to the current political and security tensions.

Being somewhat more familiar with traveling in the region, and knowing that I would be in Cairo with friends, I made up my mind to go as planned. I did decide, however, not to visit Tahrir Square, which has become a less than welcoming place for foreigners in general and Israelis in particular.

DESPITE HAVING a US passport, I always try to travel in the Arab world on my Israeli one, and this trip was no exception. I did, however, take some precautions.

On the advice of some Israeli friends who work in security, I checked into the hotel on my US passport; a hotel clerk making a few dollars a day can easily be bribed by terrorist groups to provide information about Israeli guests. I also locked all of my Israeli documents in the room safe and carried only my US passport with me in my travels around Cairo. I only had to show it once, while visiting an open-air market behind the foreign ministry.

I was taking pictures and a young man stopped me and asked me who I was taking pictures for, adding that I required a permit. I told him in Arabic that I didn’t need a permit, that Egypt was a democracy now, but he insisted.

I told him the pictures were for my private use, and showed him my US passport. He accepted my explanation, and then insisted I come with him to photograph some graffiti on the Foreign Ministry walls. With a big smile on his face, he proudly translated some of it: “death to Israel,” “cancel the peace treaty with Israel,” etc.

On Friday night, as the Israeli Embassy was under attack, I was sitting with an Egyptian friend in a coffee shop in Zamalek, where my hotel is. Zamalek is an island in the middle of the Nile where most of the embassies in Cairo are located. There a many foreigners in Zamalek and security is always on high alert. I heard shooting from the direction of Giza, where the Israeli embassy is located. I thought it was fireworks from a wedding celebration, such as I often hear from my home in Jerusalem.

When I woke up the next morning, however, I learned of the horrible attack against the Israeli Embassy, and the failure of the Egyptian security forces to prevent it. My friends at the MECA meeting condemned the attack both publicly and in private, and also expressed their concern for my security and their solidarity, assuring me that they would protect me.

At the meeting, the well known professor and democracy activist Saad Eddin Ibrahim, who had been jailed and tortured by Mubarak, gave a brilliant presentation about the Egyptian revolution and how Tahrir square, and many other squares around Egypt, had been transformed into “Parliaments of the People.” In my speech, which followed Prof. Ibrahim’s, I tried to express the deep concern felt by Israelis at what we saw going on around us in “the neighborhood.” The “Parliaments of the People,” I said, were beginning to look like “Parliaments of the mobs.”

Viewed through Israeli eyes, I said, the neighborhood looked quite disturbing. Lebanon is ruled by Hizbullah – an Iranian proxy, and Gaza is controlled by Hamas – an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood. The West Bank could easily fall into Hamas hands as well. Egypt could easily be taken over by the Muslim Brotherhood. If the Syrian revolution is successful it, too, could be taken over by the Muslim Brotherhood, as could Jordan, if the Hashemite regime is overthrown. In addition, from the Israeli perspective Turkey is on its way to becoming a radical Islamic state. A scary picture indeed.

THE NARGILA boy in the coffee shop in Zamalek asked me where I was from. “Falestin,” I said. “Very good,” he replied, “we love Palestine … I will kill all of the Israelis for you!” I asked him why he hated Israelis so much. Did he know any Israelis, I asked? No, and he didn’t want to, he replied. He hated the Israelis, he said, because they killed Palestinians and took their land, and because now they were also killing Egyptians. I asked him what he would think if Israel ended the occupation and made peace with a Palestinian state. After a brief pause, he said, “if they make real peace and free the Palestinians and let them have a state, we will have nothing against Israel, ahalan w’sahalan (welcome).”

This young man, educated on the street, and by Al Jazeera, probably knows almost nothing about the conflict, but his views reflect those of millions of Arabs all over the region, and millions of Turks as well. People across this region are willing to accept an Israel that lives in peace with its Arab neighbors. Israel is hated in the Arab and Muslim world not, as many Israelis believe, simply because they deny our right to exist. If Israel would only understand that its relations with the Palestinians determine the level of its acceptance in the region perhaps we would be at a very different place today.

People in the MECA meeting said that the 2002 Arab Peace Initiative was still on the table and serves as the basis for Israel to be a welcome member throughout the region.

All of the Egyptians that I have spoken with condemned the attack against the Israeli embassy. The story on the street and among the youth leaders of the revolution is that the leaders of the mobs that torched the Ministry of Interior, the headquarters of the el-Ghad party and the Israeli embassy have been identified as members of the hated former internal security forces. They say that these people are actively working to undermine the revolution and to show that post-Mubarak Egypt is a lawless society where all security has broken down. They hope to hijack the revolution and to bring back the old regime.

My first impulse was to dismiss this claim as just another Arab conspiracy theory, but after talking to some serious analysts and experts I changed my mind. It seems there is a very real possibility that these attacks were in fact carried out by anti-revolutionary “agents provocateurs.”

From my admittedly non-scientific reading of the Cairo street “map,” the Egyptian masses do not support the attack against the Israeli embassy. They do not support warm peace with Israel or forms of normalization because in their view Israel has not implemented the second chapter of the Israeli-Egyptian peace treaty of Camp David – ending the occupation, but they do understand and support the strategic importance of the peace for Egypt.. Egyptians do not want to go to war against Israel.

I HAVE also been in Turkey more than 100 times, for joint Israeli-Arab meetings, mainly during the years of the second intifada when it was almost impossible to meet locally. I have met Turkish President Abdullah Gul and hosted him in Jerusalem when he was foreign minister.

I know the current foreign minister Mr. Ahmet Davutoglu, from when he was an advisor to the party leader. We have remained in contact over the past years via email. The AKP in Turkey is not a radical Islamic party, nor are its leaders radical Muslims. The root cause of the free-fall of Israel/Turkey relations is the same as that of the Arab street’s hatred of Israel: the continuation and entrenching of the Israeli occupation, when there is a moderate – as understood by most of the world – Palestinian leadership willing to make peace with Israel.

Notwithstanding the fact that we are not solely responsible for the lack of peace, we have clearly not done enough to strive for real peace. The current events in Cairo and Ankara should be our wake-up call. Most of our leaders will respond by calling for higher walls, when what we really need are stronger bridges. An Israel reaching out to the Palestinians and willing to make peace with them – not an imaginary peace with a Palestinian state floating in the air, but one based on the 1967 borders – will find a welcoming neighborhood in Benghazi, Baghdad, Beirut, Amman, Cairo, Ankara, Ramallah and even in Gaza.

Gershon Baskin is the founder and co-director of IPCRI, the Israel Palestine Center for Research and Information, he hosts a weekly radio show in Hebrew on All for Peace radio, and a voluntary columnist for The Jerusalem Post.

Gershon Baskin, Ph.D. 
P.O. Box 9321, Jerusalem 91092
Cellphone: +972-(0)52-238-1715
gershonbaskin@gmail.com

An Israeli Case for a Palestinian State – NY Times Op-ed by Yossi Alpher – Might there be a silver lining?

If Yossi Alpher is right, there may be a silver lining for Israel after a UN vote for a Palestinian State that actually frees PA President Mahmud Abbas to negotiate a final end-of-conflict and end-of-claims resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict resulting in a two-states for two-peoples agreement.

On Sunday, August 28 I posted a piece entitled Why the Palestinians Can’t Recognize the Jewish State? http://mondoweiss.net/2011/08/why-the-palestinians-can%E2%80%99t-recognize-the-jewish-state.html This piece explains from a Palestinian perspective the principled problem they face in concluding any agreement with Israel for a two-states for two-peoples agreement. For the Palestinians to acknowledge a Jewish State of Israel means their having to negate their own claim that Palestine is Palestinian and that the refugees have the right to return to their homes they vacated in 1948 and 1967.

Yossi Alpher argues in this article (link below) that a UN vote relieves Abbas of this obstacle and enables him with international cover to conclude a two-state agreement with Israel. Why? Because the UN vote essentially sets the principle of two states, Palestine and Israel, separated by a border drawn roughly along the 1949 armistice lines with land swaps to be negotiated.

Why is Abbas not saying this out loud? There are two possibilities: [1] he is waiting for the new reality to be established by the UN, and only after that happens and after the Palestinian State is established can he legitimately say to the Palestinians that the resolution they themselves wanted effectively eliminated their claims to a greater Palestine, or [2] he is duplicitous and has no intention of giving up the dream of a “Greater Palestine” and regards a negotiated agreement with Israel as only the first part of a two-stage process leading to a greater Palestinian State.

Abbas is not stupid, nor is he blind to political reality. I believe, based on what Yossi Alpher is suggesting, that he is cunning and sees the UN move as the only way he can be relieved of the burden of worrying about the refugees’ claims to their right to return to the actual homes and/or land that they vacated.

Israel has always drawn a red line about this issue. There is consensus across the Israeli political spectrum that Palestinian refugees would have the right to return to Palestine and not to Israel, for to assert otherwise is to forfeit the Jewish character of the State and the raison d’etre of Zionism and Israel. Perhaps Israelis might be amenable to some symbolic Palestinian return as former PM Olmert agreed to do (5000 refugees in the first 10 years).

In 9 days the UN will take up this issue. The US has promised to veto the resolution in the Security Council. Such a resolution, however, is expected to pass in the General Assembly. (See the J Street resolution that I posted on Friday, September 9)

An Israeli Case for a Palestinian State – NY Times Op-ed by Yossi Alpher http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/12/opinion/12iht-edalpher12.html?_r=1&ref=global