“The Less Impossible Israeli-Palestinian Peace – The two-state idea is comatose but not dead” – Roger Cohen (NYT op-ed)

“The two-state idea is comatose until Trump is gone, and Netanyahu is gone, and Mahmoud Abbas, the president of the Palestinian Authority, is gone — and then some. But it is no more “impossible” than was the fall of the Berlin Wall or the disappearance of the Soviet Union. “There is a distinction between a coma and being dead,” Jeremy Ben-Ami, the president of the nonprofit advocacy group J Street, told me.”


Roger Cohen’s op-ed (NYT July 31, 2020) is an important piece. If you are not yet persuaded that a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is more possible than a one-state solution (per Peter Beinart) then Roger will persuade you that 2-states is and must be for the sake of both the Jewish people and the Palestinians.

A Response to Seth Rogen

The recent interview with Seth Rogen on the podcast “WTF with Marc Maron” was intended to promote Rogen’s new film, “An American Pickle.” However, Rogen’s comments about Israel and what he learned in religious school and left-wing Zionist summer camp upset a lot of American Jews and Israelis while reflecting the conundrum of millennial and boomer American Jews in our relationship with the Jewish State.

I offer a response to Seth and others in the millennial generation as well as Generation X, Z and Baby Boomers in my blog at the Times of Israel.

See – https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/a-response-to-seth-rogen-2/

Correction – Voting-by-mail details here

In my former blog-post “The Simple Act of Voting will Determine the Election on November 3rd,” I indicated dates for mailing vote-by-mail ballots for the November 3, 2020 election that are incorrect. Please look at this site for the correct information:

https://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/voter-registration/vote-mail/vbm-nov2020-general-election/#vote-by-mail

Note as well that the Trump administration’s cynical efforts to disrupt mail delivery through the United States Postal Service (already happening) needs to be watched carefully going forward. If matters to not improve, it is possible to fill out and sign your vote-by-mail ballots and deliver them personally to your polling place on November 3 without necessarily having to wait in line. That way, at the least, you will know that your vote will be counted.

If you forwarded my earlier blog to friends, please forward this one as well. Thanks and apologies.

The Simple Act of Voting will Determine the Election on November 3rd

David Plouffe, the campaign manager for Barack Obama’s successful 2008 presidential campaign, spoke briefly in his July 30th podcast “Campaign HQ” (which I highly recommend) about mail-in-voting. He said the following (I added more comments):

  • More than 7-8% of mail-in ballots are thrown out and 10% of first-time voters’ ballots are discarded or set aside because the voter makes a mistake. Given that the US Postal Service will experience a surge in ballots-by-mail, the count may be delayed. Further, we know at this time that Trump’s appointment of Louis DeJoy, a big donor to Trump’s campaign with no experience in managing the US Postal Service, is already trying to undermine the election by putting up obstacles for delivery of the mail to give an advantage to Trump and Republican candidates.

David Plouffe says, of course, that we can all vote in-person on November 3rd if we aren’t overly concerned about catching the disease. Our votes will certainly count that way. But, if we want to vote-by-mail, there’s no reason to wait to request a ballot now (see note below for California voters). Once we do that, here are questions to consider:

  • If you are not registered to vote in your state, what are the rules for voter registration? Check on-line to find out.
  • Is your request for a mail-in-ballot in?
  • What are the rules for voting-by-mail? They are all stated on the ballot. Be sure to read them carefully.
  • Does the mail-in-ballot require postage?
  • Do the rules say that we have to sign the outside of the ballot envelope?
  • Do we need a witness to sign it with us?
  • Are we signing our name legibly and exactly as our name appears on the ballot?
  • Does the ballot need to be post-marked before the election? (In California, ballots must be postmarked by October 19, 2020 and received by October 27, 2020). Check on-line in your state to see when the period of voting-by-mail takes place. For Californians, here is the web-site with all the necessary information: https://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/voting-resources/voting-california/election-dates-and-resources/
  • After we complete the ballot, check to be certain that you filled it out exactly as instructed?
  • Leave nothing to chance!

I happily received the following email from the California Secretary of State two weeks ago:

Dear California Voter, 

All California voters will be sent a vote-by-mail ballot with prepaid postage for the General Election.

To make sure you get your ballot, we are asking all California voters to double-check their voter registration at:

https//voterstatus.sos.ca.gov

You can ensure a smooth voting experience by:

  • Confirming your mailing address on the above site
  • Signing up for ballot tracking notifications by phone, email, or text on the above site

For voters unable to take advantage of vote-by-mail, you can still visit your local polling place for safe in-person voting and same-day registration.

Don’t miss out on the opportunity to have your ballot mailed directly to your home!

On behalf of the California Secretary of State’s Office, thank you!

P.S. Help us spread the word! Forward this email to 3 friends or family members (or more) and remind them it’s important to double-check their voter registration before the November election.

Do you know someone who is eligible to vote but may not be registered? Forward this email and tell them to register at registertovote.ca.gov

PLEASE SHARE THIS BLOG-POST WITH WHOMEVER YOU FEEL COULD BENEFIT FROM IT!

“The great enemy of clear language is insincerity.” George Orwell

I thought of Orwell’s remark as it became clear that the Democratic National Committee in its platform is avoiding calling Israel’s policy in the West Bank an “occupation.” Though the platform calls for two states for two peoples as the only just, fair, and secure resolution possible for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Jeremy Ben-Ami and James Zogby explain in The Nation this week why “It’s Time for the Democratic Party to Mention the Occupation – If the next Democratic administration is serious about promoting peace, the party platform needs to condemn Israel’s illegal occupation by name.”

They say,

“Without admitting the existence of occupation, one cannot understand how Palestinians are daily deprived of their fundamental rights—or why they demand freedom and independent statehood. Without admitting occupation, one cannot understand why so many veteran Israeli political and security leaders warn that the country’s unending rule over another people is eroding its democratic institutions and leading it down (in the words of former prime minister Ehud Barak) “a slippery slope toward apartheid.” 

See – https://t.co/VwH6y9Rbdz

Who was Braxton Bragg?

President Trump mentioned Fort Bragg (both a city in Northern California and a fort in North Carolina) this week and asked Chris Wallace rhetorically in his Sunday morning interview on Fox if these ought to be renamed after the Reverend Al Sharpton instead, revealing yet again the racism of the President.

I did not know who, in fact, Braxton Bragg was and so I checked Wikipedia and Ron Chernow’s remarkable biography Grant (i.e. General Ulysses S. Grant). Here is part of what I learned:

Wikipedia – (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Braxton_Bragg):

Braxton Bragg (March 22, 1817 – September 27, 1876) was an American army officer during the Second Seminole War and Mexican–American War and later a Confederate army officer who served as a general in the Confederate Army during the American Civil War, serving in the Western Theater

In November 1862, Bragg’s army was routed by Maj. Gen. Ulysses S. Grant in the Battles for Chattanooga and pushed back to Georgia. Confederate President Jefferson Davis subsequently relieved Bragg of command, recalling him to Richmond to serve as his chief military advisor. Bragg briefly returned to the field as a corps commander near the end of the war during the Campaign of the Carolinas.”

Ron Chernow says of him:

“Braxton Bragg, a North Carolina native and West Point graduate, who had met Grant during the Mexican War and later worked as a Louisiana sugar planter [Bragg was an owner of many human beings as slaves]. A cold martinet with a gaunt, narrow face and beetling brows, Bragg had flashing eyes that suggested his combustible temperament…

He was possessed of an irascible temper, and was naturally disputatious. A stickler for rules, Bragg took sadistic delight in punishing people for violations, forcing fellow soldiers to witness executions of deserters. ‘He loved to crush the spirit of his men,’ said a soldier. ‘Not a single soldier in the whole army ever loved or respected him.’” (p. 316)

At Missionary Ridge, Chernow notes:

“‘An Army never was whipped so badly as Bragg was,’ exulted Grant… ‘Bragg is in full retreat, burning his depots and bridges. The Chickamauga Valley, for a distance of 10 miles, is full of the fires lighted in his flight.’

..For Braxton Bragg, the disgrace was total. ‘Bragg looked scared,’ one Confederate soldier remarked. ‘He had put spurs to his horse, and was running like a scared dog…Poor fellow, he looked so hacked and whipped and mortified and chagrined at defeat.’ When Bragg forwarded his resignation to Richmond, the Confederate government hastened to accept it.” (p. 325)

“Bragg is generally considered among the worst generals of the Civil War. Most of the battles in which he engaged ended in defeat. Bragg was extremely unpopular with both the men and the officers of his command, who criticized him for numerous perceived faults, including poor battlefield strategy, a quick temper, and overzealous discipline. Bragg has a generally poor reputation with historians, though some point towards the failures of Bragg’s subordinates, especially Leonidas Polk—a close ally of Jefferson Davis and known enemy of Bragg—as more significant factors in the many Confederate defeats at Bragg’s command. The losses which Bragg suffered are cited as principal factors in the ultimate defeat of the Confederacy.” (Wikipedia)

From these accounts, Braxton Bragg is presented as a sadistic owner of human beings, a traitor to the Union, and a failed Confederate General.

If Trump wants to keep Bragg’s name on a city and on a fort, that says as much about Trump as a heartless, racist, and failed Commander in-Chief as it does about Bragg himself.

John Lewis’ Philosophy of Non-Violent Redemptive Suffering

The following quote reveals Congressman John Lewis’ reliance on the principles of his religious faith and the philosophy of non-violence that he, Dr. King, and others made real in the Civil Rights Movement. His death is a significant loss to Congress, to the American people, and to humanity as a whole. May John Lewis’ life, courage, and moral leadership be remembered always.

“Non-violent suffering affects not only ourselves but it touches and changes around us as well. It opens us and those around us to a force beyond ourselves, a force that is right and moral, the force of righteous truth that is the basis of human conscience. Suffering puts us and those around us in touch with our consciences. It opens and touches our hearts, makes us feel compassion where we need to and guilt if we must… One method of practicing this approach when faced with a hateful, angry, aggressive even despicable person is to imagine that person, actually visualize him or her as an infant, as a baby. If you can see this full grown attacker who faces you as a pure innocent child that he or she once was, it is not hard to find compassion in your heart. Then it wasn’t just a tactic. It was a way of life. It was embracing the Biblical proscription that one must love one’s enemies. And it’s the hardest thing in the world to carry out.”

-Transcribed from the NY Times Daily Podcast “The Life and Legacy of John Lewis” – July 20, 2020

I Have Not Given Up on a Two-State Solution

I continue to read with increasing sadness the charged discussion in the American Jewish community provoked by Peter Beinart’s long essay in Jewish Currents and much shorter op-ed in the NYTimes in which he explains why he believes that a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is dead and why he now advocates for a one-state solution to this seemingly intractable conflict.

See Peter’s essay in Jewish Currents at https://jewishcurrents.org/yavne-a-jewish-case-for-equality-in-israel-palestine/ and his op-ed in the NYTimeshttps://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/08/opinion/israel-annexation-two-state-solution.html

Many have written thoughtful and persuasive rebuttals to Peter’s ideas in the American and Israeli press. Most recently, Middle East experts Dennis Ross and David Makovsky, who had senior roles in past U.S. government efforts to advance the Israeli-Palestinian peace process, wrote for the Washington Institute for Near East Policy why they believe, contrary to Peter’s position, that the two-state solution remains viable and is essential for Israeli-Palestinian peace – “Don’t Give Up on the Two-State Solution” (July 14, 2020) – https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/view/dont-give-up-on-the-two-state-solution. I recommend their piece most especially. I agree with them.

I add as a warning only the words of the late Israeli writer and peace activist Amos Oz who, in his last book Dear Zealots – Letters from a Divided Land (New York: Mariner Books, 2019) wrote:

 “Apart from Switzerland, all bi-national and multinational states are either barely squeaking by (Belgium, the United Kingdom, Spain) or have already deteriorated into violent conflict (Lebanon, Cyprus, the former Yugoslavia and the USSR). There’s no successful historical model of two people’s living side by side in one state, especially in the Middle East… 

“There must be compromise between Israel and Palestine. There must be two states. We must divide this land and turn it into a duplex.

On both sides there are many people who loathe the very idea of compromise, viewing any concession as weakness, as pitiful surrender. Whereas I think that in the lives of families, neighbors, and nations, choosing to compromise is in fact choosing life. The opposite of compromise is not pride or integrity or idealism. The opposite of compromise is fanaticism and death…” 

Indeed, any action taken unilaterally by Israel (e.g. building and expanding more West Bank settlements, annexing portions of the West Bank, confiscating privately owned Palestinian land, destroying “illegal Palestinian homes,” intensifying the military occupation of East Jerusalem and the West Bank) or by the Palestinians (e.g. cancelling security agreements with Israel, initiating violence against Israelis, declaring an independent state outside of bi-lateral negotiations) that makes a two-state solution more difficult to achieve ought to be condemned by all who support both a secure Jewish and democratic State of Israel and the legitimate national rights of the Palestinian people to a state of their own peacefully existing alongside Israel.

I hope and pray that a President Joe Biden and a reconstituted American State Department will bring the Israelis and Palestinians back into good-faith negotiations to assure Israeli and Palestinian security, justice, human rights, national dignity and sovereignty to the Palestinians, and peace between our two peoples.

On Great Leadership – Doris Kearns Goodwin

The Pulitzer Prize winning presidential historian, Doris Kearns Goodwin, delivers a number of short sessions on a new web-series called “Masterclass.” Throughout her long career she has written extensively on Presidents Abraham Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt, Franklin D. Roosevelt, and Lyndon B. Johnson.

As I listened to her, I copied her definition of what constitutes great leadership and couldn’t help but compare the four great presidents above to the current occupant of the Oval Office. She said:

“Leadership is the ability to use one’s talent, skills and emotional intelligence to mobilize people to a common purpose and to make a positive difference in people’s lives. The qualities important for great leadership are humility, empathy, resilience, self-awareness, self-reflection, the ability to create a team where people can argue with you and question your assumptions, and the ability to communicate to people with stories to make them feel a part of what you’re saying. The most important thing is the willingness to take a risk because the ambition for the greater good has become greater for you than for yourself.”

New York Philharmonic Clarinetist Takes Two Knees to Protest Racism

There are four moving musical videos within the article (link below).

After the musicians play so beautifully, they all go down on their knees in an attitude of prayer and solidarity against racism and injustice and in affirmation of Black Lives Matter.

The musicians are Anthony McGill (clarinet), Allison Loggins-Hull (flute), Laurence Brownlee (voice), and the Duke Ellington School of the Arts, Annapolis Symphony Academy, The Northwest School in Seattle, Washington, and Antigua & Barbuda Youth Symphony Orchestra.

https://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2020/06/15/clarinetist-anthony-mcgill