Kamala Harris’ Superb Nuanced Statement About the Necessity of Ending the Israel-Hamas War Now
26 Friday Jul 2024
Posted in Uncategorized
26 Friday Jul 2024
Posted in Uncategorized
21 Sunday Jul 2024
Posted in Uncategorized
I love Joe Biden – always have. He has heart and his personal losses, wonderful marriage and loving children and grandchildren, the esteem of his colleagues and from the Democratic Party, and his understanding of America’s purpose in the world have made him a great president with accomplishments that will be compared with FDR and LBJ. But, he’s having a hard time aging and letting go, and that’s sad to watch. We all get old, if we’re lucky. At almost 75, I’m beginning to understand the effects of aging much better myself – mild memory loss, loss of quickness of mind, more aches and pains, physical weariness earlier in the day, etc. etc. etc. – but so much positive comes with aging too – a greater perspective, enhanced appreciation, deepening gratitude, wider generosity of heart, inner calm.
Joe is a great man, and perhaps his resistance in stepping aside is part of the reason for his greatness, that his dogged persistence in making a difference, to do what few human beings have been successful in doing – reaching the highest office in the world – blinds him to the new reality in his life – getting old. Joe’s accomplishments as a leader, politician and statesman are very great, but his time to step aside has come – that’s obvious to any objective observer.
Step aside Joe – we love you. We admire you. Your legacy will stand the test of time. You will rise even higher than #14 in the long list of presidents as history judges you so very well.
Here are some inspired thoughts about getting older, both from the perspective of one who ages and from philosophers, anthropologists, sociologists, artists, and writers. If anyone knows Joe personally who reads this, share these quotations with him and Jill. He has nothing to fear and everything to gain. He has been and can be still our hero and example.
Aging is a gift – “Aging is a gift, a chance to keep growing, learning and experiencing life in new ways. It’s about defying limitations and embracing the possibilities that lie ahead… It’s not about passively accepting age it’s about actively living each day to the fullest, wrinkles and all.” -David S. Cantor
Senility and Aging – “I feel as if I’m losing all my leaves. The branches, and the wind, and the rain… I don’t know what’s happening any more. Do you know what’s happening?” -“The Father” with Anthony Hopkins
Compensation of Growing Old – “The compensation of growing old, Peter Walsh thought, coming out of Regent’s Park, and holding his hat in his hand was simply this, that the passions remain as strong as ever, but one has gained – at last! – The power which adds the supreme flavour to existence – the power of taking hold of experience, of turning it round, slowly, in the light.” -Virginia Woolf, Mrs. Dalloway
Respecting the Aged – “Respect an old man who has lost his learning: remember that the fragments of the tablets broken by Moses were preserved alongside the new.” – -Babylonian Talmud, B’rachot 8b
The Aging Artist – “The art of fresco was not work for old me…one paints with the brain and not with the hands.” -Michelangelo
“Clouds of affection from our younger eyes / Conceal the emptiness which age descries. / The soul’s dark cottage, battered and decayed. / Let’s in new light through chinks that time hath made.”-Rembrandt
Characteristics of Old-Age Style in Work of Greatest Painters and Sculptors – “A sense of isolation, a feeling of holy rage, developing into what I have called transcendental pessimism: a mistrust of reason, a belief in instinct. … the feeling that the crimes and follies of mankind must be accepted with resignation… a retreat from realism, an impatience with established technique and a craving for complete unity of treatment, as if the picture were an organism in which every member shared in the life of the whole.” – Kenneth Clark, Aging Artists
The Complete Life – “The complete life, the perfect pattern, includes old age as well as youth and maturity. The beauty of the morning and the radiance of noon are good, but it would be a very silly person who drew the curtains and turned on the light in order to shut out the tranquility of the evening. Old age has its pleasures which, though different, are not less than the pleasures of youth.” -W. Somerset Maugham, The Summing Up
Loving Life – “No man loves life like him that’s growing old.” -Sophocles, Acrisius
Growing Old – “Grow old along with me! / The best is yet to be, / The last of life, for which the first was made.” -Robert Browning
The Secret of Old Age – “The secret of a good old age is simply an honorable pact with solitude.” -Gabriel Garcia Marquez, One Hundred Years of Solitude
Continuing On – “There is only one solution if old age is not to be an absurd parody of our former life, and that is to go on pursuing ends that give our existence a meaning.” -Simone de Beauvoir, The Coming of Age
The Blessings of Age – “For age is opportunity no less / Than youth itself, though in another dress. / And as the evening twilight fades away / The sky is filled with stars, invisible by day.” -Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, Morituri Salutamus
A Truth About Growing Older – “As you grow older, you will discover that you have two hands, one for helping yourself, the other for helping others.” -Audrey Hepburn
The Life of the Elderly – “We cannot live the afternoon of life according to the program of life’s morning.” -Carl Jung
The Art of Growing Old – “The art of growing old is the art of being regarded by the oncoming generations as a support and not a stumbling block.” -Andre Maurois, An Art of Living
17 Wednesday Jul 2024
Posted in Uncategorized
Watch this spectacular audition with Israeli and Palestinian teens singing “Home” together. A must watch in these tough post-October 7 times.
https://www.jta.org/2024/07/17/culture/jerusalem-youth-chorus-advances-on-americas-got-talent-with-performance-of-home?utm_source=JTA_Maropost&utm_campaign=JTA_DB&utm_medium=email&mpweb=1161-74884-93170
14 Sunday Jul 2024
Posted in Uncategorized
Tags
Introductory Note: This op-ed, published today in Israel’s Haaretz newspaper, was written by Israel’s former Prime Minister and Minister of Defense and once the most decorated soldier in Israel’s history. It is both a pragmatic and visionary response to the extremist, self-destructive and dangerous rhetoric of right-wing messianic members in the current Israeli government. I urge you to read his analysis carefully. Haaretz is a subscription newspaper. I have urged my readers to subscribe for years as it is among the most important publications produced for thinking people in Israel itself and in the English speaking world.
Op-ed – Ehud Barak – Former Israeli Prime Minister – July 14, 2024 – Haaretz
“We have reached nine months of war. Despite the sacrifice and courage our soldiers and commanders display every day, and despite the harsh blows felt by Hamas and Hezbollah, still none of the war’s goals have been met. What’s more, the strategic paralysis exhibited by Israel’s leadership risks a comprehensive and prolonged regional conflict, while the deepening rift with the United States expands, and the country is being plunged into international isolation. This must not be allowed to happen.
This complex situation has generated a growing discourse in recent weeks, including in this newspaper and on television channels, centering on expectations or demands that Israel threaten to use its alleged nuclear capabilities as a means of emerging victorious from this crisis. There are those who even propose to consider actually making use of this ability.
This discourse, to the best of my understanding, is unnecessary, unhelpful and may even be harmful. It reflects feelings of frustration and helplessness, which are not desirable counsels to strategy and statesmanship. What is required here is common sense, not fantasies.
The failure to achieve the war’s goals does not stem from Israel’s use of conventional weapons alone, rather, it was the reluctance to determine on October 8 what we want the “day after” the war to look like. This reluctance derives from the prime minister’s considerations regarding his political survival and the extortion by extremists in his coalition against him. It has led to treading water and wasting military achievements that were reached at the cost of blood.
The solution to the impasse is to first remove the obstruction that caused it, that is, to replace the head and remove reckless figures from the government – and by not resorting to measures that many of those promoting them don’t even understand their implications.
Second, say “yes, but!” to the U.S. initiative to create an “axis of moderation” under its leadership, centering around Israel, Egypt, the United Arab Emirates and perhaps Saudi Arabia as well, that will ready itself against the “axis of resistance”: Iran, Syria, Hezbollah, Hamas and others, led by Russia. We saw the axis of moderation’s potential on the “night of the missiles” launched from Iran in April. That’s the appropriate strategic horizon for Israel.
In the words of Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel is simultaneously an all-powerful nation saving the world from a new Islamo-Nazi threat, and a whining victim abandoned to its fate of being threatened with annihilation by “Amalekites” from without and “traitors” from within. This bipolar perspective is disrupting his judgment of reality and dragging many confused Israelis into it.
Readers of newspapers in Israel can get the impression that, on the one hand, we can destroy and annihilate all our enemies one after the other at the slightest provocation, swiftly and at a tolerable price. On the other hand, the whole world is against us, and we can only rely on the Almighty and on Dimona, the site of an Israeli nuclear reactor.
That is not the case. Even today, in July 2024, Israel is the strongest state – militarily and strategically – in the region. The “axis of moderation” the United States is proposing is the most effective deterrent against an overall regional war at any foreseeable future. This axis is also the correct framework to ensure victory, if such war were to break out.
The threat of the “Dimona option” and the discourse around it doesn’t convey determination or power. They radiate insecurity, weakness and confusion, imbalance and a pinch of panic. The reason is that Iran knows our strategic capabilities far better than the Israeli public. The ayatollahs in Tehran are extreme fanatics, but they are also calculated chess players and certainly not stupid.
Similar to North Korea’s leadership – who has no intention of dropping a bomb on South Korea or Japan, understanding such actions would lead North Korea back to the Stone Age – Iran’s nuclear program has two goals. The first and foremost one is to ensure the regime’s survival. The second is to build – under the umbrella of the “strategic balance” that would be created by a military nuclear capability – a reliable conventional threat. The late and cursed Qassem Soleimani, called it a “ring of fire” which would exhaust Israel in a prolonged war of attrition until it weakens and collapses.
This “ring of fire” is based on proxies like Hezbollah, Hamas, the Houthis and others. They are equipped with drones, rockets and missiles, some of them highly accurate, and have terror units trained with precise weapons, like the Kornet anti-tank missile, operating within the population and prepared to conduct years of guerrilla warfare, even under occupation.
The U.S.-led “axis of moderation” is the right answer to the current situation, where, despite the rapid progress, Iran is still hesitating to develop military nuclear capabilities. If it decides to do so, it will still take it another year or so to get to a crude nuclear weapon and a decade to build an initial arsenal. But Iran is already a nuclear threshold state, meaning Israel and the United States have no surgical way to stop it from obtaining nuclear weapons.
This requires an alignment between Israel, the U.S. and regional allies. Ali Khamenei and the ayatollahs know that Israel hasn’t hesitated to attack states in the region to thwart their production of nuclear weapons. But they also know that for the past 50 years, Israel has been making efforts and huge investments to ensure an adequate response to a situation in which a state in the region obtains nuclear weapons. Despite the attempts to stop it, Israel is not without means.
Strategic capabilities are at their best when they remain a threat. During the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union, this approach even kept at bay wide conventional confrontations. For reasons familiar to anyone who dealt with the matter, such abilities are not suitable means for preventive attacks. There’s no logic in considering them in a situation that is not a real, immediate, irrevocable existential threat, which cannot be thwarted in any other way.
This is definitely not our situation. Certainly not in view of the existing alternatives – joining the “axis of moderation” and replacing the failed Israeli leadership. These two steps will provide a quick, simple and much cheaper solution than resorting to the “Dimona option.”
The primary global danger posed by Iran’s nuclearization is that it will set off a chain reaction of nuclearization in Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Turkey, thereby bringing down the entire regime of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, commonly known as the Non-Proliferation Treaty or NPT. By its very creation, the U.S.-led axis can answer this challenge as well, in that it provides a “nuclear umbrella” to Saudi Arabia and Egypt. (Turkey already has such an umbrella through its membership in NATO.)
It is no coincidence that nuclear weapons have not been used in 80 years. Israel’s famous declaration that it will not be the first country to introduce nuclear weapons into the region remains the correct policy.
There is also no reason to remove Israel’s nuclear ambiguity since, as noted, there is nothing the Iranians do not know. Lifting the ambiguity would only be seen as a gimmick meant to assuage the general despondency in Israel. Such a move, and also insinuations a la “Remember Dimona,” are liable to give Iran the incentive and the legitimacy to accelerate the race toward nuclear weapons, on the grounds that it is threatened by Israel’s “nuclear capability,” which, unlike Iran, has not even signed the NPT.
Israel is indeed in a complex situation requiring courage, discipline, sober, reality-based strategic thinking, making difficult decisions and determination in carrying them out. The current leadership is equipped with almost none of these. Alien considerations are leading it – and us with it – toward the abyss.
“Dimona talk” in the current context is unnecessary and harmful, and only distracts us from what is truly needed: to immediately replace the sinkers of the Titanic and join the axis of moderation with the United States. Such talk contributes no understanding, common sense or a relevant course of action for the challenge we face. We must end it immediately.”
11 Thursday Jul 2024
Posted in Uncategorized
Tags
Ben is a friend who I met when I served for a year representing the J Street Rabbinic and Cantorial Cabinet on the Board of J Street, a national pro-Israel, pro-peace, pro-democracy organization based in Washington, D.C.
I urge you to read Ben’s heart-breaking account (published in the Jewish Journal of Northern California) of his Palestinian friends living in the West Bank who have become victims of the extreme right-wing Israeli government’s de facto (leading to de jure) illegal annexation of an increasing amount of West Bank territory. As the tumult in American politics, the horror of October 7 and the Israel-Hamas War continue, news about the West Bank has not broken through nearly enough in the west.
I am grateful to Ben for bringing this one single tragedy that just took place in the South Hebron Hills to our attention. Read his heart-breaking account here: https://jweekly.com/2024/07/10/i-am-an-israeli-american-jew-bulldozing-palestinian-homes-is-personal-for-me/
04 Thursday Jul 2024
Posted in Uncategorized
Tags
George Stephanopoulos has done America a great favor in publishing his readable and well-researched analysis of every American president’s use of the White House Situation Room (aka Sit Room) since it was established during the presidency of John F. Kennedy in Stephanopoulos’ The Situation Room – The Inside Story of Presidents in Crisis (2024). To learn how other recent presidents (e.g. G.H.W. Bush, Clinton, G.W. Bush, Obama, and Biden) engaged fully with the Sit Room, American intelligence and military experts, and foreign policy crisis’s, I am filled with horror with what Trump did, did not do, and never learned to do as Commander in Chief. Stephanopoulos reveals Trump’s abject incompetence and the danger he poses to western civilization and America’s standing in the world.
As we now anxiously watch how the post-debate Biden crisis unfolds, wait for Stephanopoulos’ interview of Biden on Friday (July 5) and whatever other unscripted interviews the campaign arranges for Joe in the short term, and witness the precipitous loss of public and congressional support for Joe that may well compel him to step aside (despite his expressed intention to continue the campaign), the book reminds any objective reader again of Joe Biden’s personal, moral, intellectual, and presidential superiority over Donald Trump.
I quote below directly from Stephanopoulos’ research describing many insiders’ description of Trump’s lack of use of the Sit Room (pages 271-298) and his chaotic, thoughtless, ignorant, small-minded, egocentric, self-serving, and dangerous approach to foreign policy while President, and what we can certainly expect should he (God forbid) be re-elected in November.
Here is some of what Stephanopoulos wrote:
As Omarosa put it in an NBC interview: “This is a White House where everybody lies. The president lies to the American people. … Sarah Huckabee stands in front of the country and lies every single day.’’… Faith and trust were apparently in short supply in this White House… Almost nothing about it [Trump’s Sit Room] was normal… During the Trump administration, the president was the crisis to be managed.
Trump tore through and wore out his national security team: Four secretaries of defense. Four directors of national intelligence. Four White House chiefs of staff and five secretaries of Homeland Security. The most damning judgments of his competence and character come from those he appointed to these most sensitive positions [each of whom were key players in the Sit Room]. His first secretary of state, Rex Tillerson, famously told colleagues that Trump was a “f_ _ _ ing moron.” James Mattis, the former Marine Corps general who served as Trump’s first secretary of defense, described him as a threat to the Constitution ‘”who does not try to unite the American people – does not even pretend to try.” Fellow Marine general and White House chief of staff John Kelly called Trump “the most flawed person I have every met in my life.”
“He was the least disciplined, least organized human I ever met in my life,” Homeland Security adviser Tom Bossert told me. No matter how hard his top aides and cabinet members tried, “None of them stopped him from constantly undermining us and making decisions outside the process.”
“Anybody with any sense-somebody like Mattis or Tillerson – they immediately shunned and stayed away from Trump,” Bossert recalls. “I mean, you couldn’t get Mattis into the White House. His view was “That’s a madman in a circular room screaming. And the less time I spend in there, the more time I can just go about my business.” In fact, Tillerson and Mattis began meeting regularly outside the White House in order to circumvent the President.
National Counter terrorism Center head Nick Rasmussen served for two years under Obama, followed by a year under Trump. The difference, he told me, was profound. “The tempo of the White House Situation Room meetings went way, way down in the Trump administration,” he recalls. “In the Obama years, I would have been to the White House three, four, five times a week” for meetings at all levels. “In the Trump administration, it could be weeks and weeks without any involvement or meetings.”
“I don’t think we got Trump into the Situation Room, in my year and a half there, more than four times,” Bossert told me. “He didn’t like that room. He didn’t like the idea that he had to go to it. He wanted everybody to come to him.”
Trump rarely sought out information from the Sit Room. He didn’t request reports, and he never called down with questions. I asked Bossert whether it was fair to say that for Trump, Fox News channel was as much a conduit of information as the Sit Room. “I don’t even think that’s in question,” he replied. “I think that’s one hundred percent accurate.” Then he told me something I’d never heard before.
“For a while, he didn’t want to see what the news channels were saying. He wanted to see what the chyrons were reading,” Bossert says. Chryons, of course, are the news briefs crawling across the bottom of the TV screen. “He wanted the chryons captured and printed… And so the Sit Room would do that. They would produce for him books of chryons prints” surely one of the most prosaic tasks ever required of the highly trained intelligence officers serving in the White House.
Trump’s penchant for inviting random people into sensitive meetings led to some uncomfortable moments. Those who didn’t have clearances, but were reluctant to defy the president, would find themselves facing irritated intelligence officers. Classified briefings became fraught, with no one in the room comfortable except for Trump, who seemed happy to have his posse with him.
After Bossert had left the White House, he received a call one day from President Trump.
Bossert was in South Korea at the time, and both he and the President were using cell phones. “I said, ‘Sir, don’t even begin this conversation,’” Bossert recalls. “I’m in a foreign country where I’m connected to their network. There’s a hundred-percent chance your phone’s being listened to, and ninety percent chance mine’s being listened to in this country. Us together on this phone call, it’s a hundred thousand percent guaranteed that they‘re listening.”
Trump replied, “Okay, Tom. You tell them I’m sick and tired of them!” And then he went on with the conversation, completely ignoring the warning. You know, he just wouldn’t listen,” Bossert says, a sense of wonderment still in his voice.
And as much as Trump complained about leaks, he also used that phone to become, essentially, leaker in chief.
“I caught him doing it,” Bossert told me. “I was walking out of the room, and he picks up the phone before I’m out of earshot and starts talking to a reporter about what just happened. And I turned around and pointed right at him. ‘Who in the hell are you talking to?’” the President essentially shrugged, seemingly unbothered at being caught.
“He does it, so he assumed everybody was that way,” Bossert says. “His paranoia was in part because he assumes everyone else acts like he acts.”
…President Trump’s capriciousness drove [National Security Advisor John Bolton] particularly crazy. I asked him how different Situation Room meetings were under Trump than under the other presidents. “They were a disaster,” he told me. “He had no idea what the issues were. He never learned anything.” Bolton believes that Trump felt “out of his element. He was surrounded by people, every one of whom knew a lot more than he did. And so he liked to retreat to the Oval office.”
“He came in thinking that his personal relationship with foreign leaders would define the quality of bilateral relations,” recalls Bolton. “He’s still saying it today. ‘I had a good relationship with Putin … with Xi, or had a bromance with Kim Jung Un’ or whatever.”
You get the idea. Stephanopoulos continued with a description of Trump’s dangerous incompetence during the Covid epidemic, his refusal to wear a mask and his forbidding others in the White House to wear masks because he thought it made everyone appear weak, the impeachable telephone call with Ukrainian President Zelensky in which Trump tried to muscle Zelensky to give him dirt on Biden in exchange for already congressionally approved military equipment, Trump’s fixation on buying Greenland and making a trade for Puerto Rico after the island suffered a devastating hurricane (to get rid of the problem despite Puerto Ricans being citizens of the United States), and, of course, January 6.
The last chapter on Biden shows a fully engaged, informed, reflective, inquisitive, and decisive president who read in granular detail the briefing books presented to him by intelligence community experts, and based on all the information he had, informed by decades of his foreign policy experience as Chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and as Vice President, made reasoned decisions. Biden’s greatest failure was the American exit from Afghanistan. Stephanopoulos describes what happened there and why.
The book is a fascinating read, and for history lovers and those who want to understand what’s behind some of the most serious foreign policy crises’s in the last 65 years in every presidency, you won’t be disappointed.
01 Monday Jul 2024
Posted in Uncategorized
Tags
Last Thursday evening was devastating for anyone who loves and respects Joe Biden and for those millions of Americans and world leaders who fear another Trump presidency. I have found myself taking both sides of the argument about whether President Biden should step aside and open up the convention in August for another candidate to emerge, or to tough it out and presume that Joe and the Biden Campaign know what they are doing and are going on overdrive to take back the initiative with a full court press with Joe as the Democratic standard bearer.
Since last Thursday’s disaster, pundits across the spectrum have weighed in on what should happen next and what likely will happen next. The very best advice I have heard is for all of us to cool it for a week or so, take a deep breath, keep the panic at bay, let the dust settle, and wait to see what Joe and the campaign choose to do.
As one individual, I recognize that I have no power or influence to compel a decision one way or another anyway, and neither do any of us. Only Joe and Jill Biden and a few of his closest advisors know in their hearts whether he is capable of serving effectively as President or not. He knows what it takes to do so and he always, characteristically, has placed the best interests of the nation and the American people first. I have to assume that that is what he intends to do. It seems, so far, that Joe and those around him believe he can do the work of the presidency despite what happened at the debate. Certainly, if he does stay in the race and it remains a Biden-Trump contest, there ought to be no question about the choice. Not voting cannot be a third option. Too much is at stake for the country and western civilization.
I am grateful this morning for the lead Editorial in The Philadelphia Inquirer that spelled out what is before us. Read it here To Serve His Country, Donald Trump Should Leave the Race