• About

Rabbi John Rosove's Blog

Rabbi John Rosove's Blog

Tag Archives: gaza

What Does it Mean to be a Liberal American Zionist?

07 Thursday Aug 2025

Posted by rabbijohnrosove in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

gaza, Israel, palestine, politics, zionism

Even before Hamas’ attack against Israel on October 7, 2023, the definition and meaning of “Zionism” had increasingly come to be understood in far-left-progressive circles in the United States and around the world in strongly cynical and pejorative terms. Zionism became even more so understood negatively once Israel began its morally just counterattack against Hamas beginning on October 8th and later against Hezbollah, the Houthis and Iran. Those who were in league with the world-wide anti-Israel movement before October 7 and who had sought for years to re-frame the Zionist narrative as discriminatory, racist, colonialist, and a product of European imperialism discovered that they were gaining increasing support among many politically progressive left-wing Americans who claimed the humanitarian mantle against what they believed was Israel’s military over-reaction to what Hamas did to Israelis on that bloodiest day in the history of the State of Israel.  

Every people has the right of self-definition, and we Zionists – and especially we liberal American Zionists – have that right as well.

I believe that this is the time for us to take back our liberal American Zionist narrative and lead with it whenever we discuss with those who know much or little about the history of the Zionist movement and the State of Israel. That is what I want to do in this blog post, to express why I am a proud liberal American Zionist despite my deep protest against the policies of this most extremist Israeli right-wing messianic government in the history of Israel.

I am a proud liberal American Zionist and as such I believe in the right of the Jewish people to a state of our own in our historic Homeland and in the right of the Jewish State militarily to defend itself when attacked by terrorists and hostile states.

As a liberal American Zionist I affirm that the universal humanitarian values advocated by the ancient prophets of Israel, developed by rabbinic tradition over the past two millennia, and included in Israel’s Declaration of Independence, namely that justice, equality, human rights, compassion, and peace must be core values guiding every Israeli government’s policies, its military and civil society.

As a liberal American Zionist I am proud of what the Zionist movement and the people and State of Israel have accomplished in virtually every arena of human endeavor including immigration and the absorption of refugees, agriculture, education, the sciences, medicine, bio-technology, cyber, culture, the arts, diplomacy, human rights, civil society, and self-defense.

As a liberal American Zionist I understand that the intent of Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, and Iran is to destroy the State of Israel and murder as many Jews as possible in their messianic zeal to establish an extremist caliphate over all of historic Palestine “from the river to the sea.” As one example of this murderous intent, Hamas’ leadership said early on in the war that 100,000 Palestinian martyrs were not too many to fulfill its extremist mission to murder Jews and destroy the Jewish state.

As a liberal American Zionist I am proud and grateful that the United States historically has been Israel’s most important and generous ally and that Israel’s security needs have enjoyed bi-partisan American political support.

As a student of Israeli and Middle East history, I know that Israel has tried many times to resolve diplomatically the Israeli-Arab and the Israeli-Palestinian conflicts resulting in two-states for two-peoples as a matter of justice for the Palestinians and enlightened self-interest for Israel, but that extremist and uncompromising Palestinian leadership has walked away every time.

As a liberal American Zionist I acknowledge that I am not an Israeli citizen, that I do not pay Israeli taxes nor do I send my children and grandchildren to the Israeli military to fight in Israel’s wars. Only Israeli citizens have the right to take the decisions that directly impact their lives and well-being. However, as an American Jew and liberal Zionist who loves Israel I believe that I have the right to share my ideas and criticism of Israeli government policies that I believe are harmful not only to Israel’s own best interests as a Jewish and democratic state but to my security and well-being as a Diaspora Jew and my liberal Jewish and democratic values.

As a liberal American Zionist, for months I have felt the anguish, grief and rage of what Hamas did on October 7th. I continue to worry daily about the survival of the remaining hostages and the well-being of their families and the families of the Israeli soldiers killed and injured in this war. I have worried as well since this war began about the suffering of the two million Palestinian civilians in Gaza.

As a liberal American Zionist I believe that Israel, in fighting this just war has not always fought the war justly. It ought to be clear that Israel has crossed many red-lines despite all the challenges and difficulties in fighting a war against a non-state actor that deliberately hides behind and uses its own people as human shields. Israel’s massive killing of tens of thousands of Palestinian civilians and its use of humanitarian aid as a weapon of war are immoral and un-Jewish.

It is American policy that Israel and all recipients of U.S. weapons must adhere by law to standards concerning humanitarian aid and the use of force. As painful as it is for me to say this because I have always supported American military aid to Israel throughout my life, I support those 27 Democratic Party Senators who voted recently to halt the sale of offensive weapons to Israel as a way to put pressure on PM Netanyahu and his extremist government to end this war now, to stop the suffering, the starvation, the killing of civilians, and the deaths of Israeli soldiers and hostages.

These 27 Senators are friends of Israel, every one of them. They have always supported Israel’s true security needs. In their vote to withhold offensive weapons now after all these months of war they carefully distinguished between those weapons and the defensive weapon systems of Iron Dome, Arrow, and David’s Sling, which save Israeli lives. These Senators should not be criticized for their vote or accused of being anti-Israel. They are not that. They instead should be praised for acting on behalf of the best interests of Israel and the Palestinians and for applying necessary pressure on this extremist Israeli government to do what is just and compassionate – to end this war now, to bring home the hostages immediately, to pour massive humanitarian aid into Gaza, and to stop the killing and injury of Israeli soldiers and Palestinian civilians.

The vast majority of Israelis themselves and the vast majority of the American Jewish community agree that the war must end now, the hostages returned home, and humanitarian aid be provided in quantities that can stop the hunger and starvation.

I say all of these things as a committed liberal American Zionist and as a lover of the people and State of Israel.

The North American Reform Jewish Movement has issued the following statement on Starvation in Gaza

28 Monday Jul 2025

Posted by rabbijohnrosove in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

gaza, hamas, Israel, palestine, politics

The ongoing crisis in Gaza is a devastating reminder of the immense human cost of war. Nearly two years into Israel’s war against Hamas, Israelis are still waiting for the return of their loved ones held hostage, and innocent Palestinians are caught in a mounting humanitarian catastrophe. Hamas has repeatedly demonstrated its willingness to sacrifice the Palestinian people in its pursuit of Israel’s destruction, but Israel must not sacrifice its own moral standing in return. Neither escalating military pressure nor restricting humanitarian aid has brought Israel closer to securing a hostage deal or ending the war.

While long-delayed and not-yet-certain to be more effective than previous efforts, we are encouraged by Saturday night’s announcement that the Israeli military would revive the practice of dropping aid from airplanes and make it easier for aid convoys, including those from the UN’s World Food Program, to move through Gaza along “designated humanitarian corridors,” and to temporarily cease fighting in Gaza for a humanitarian pause.

No one should be unaffected by the pervasive hunger experienced by thousands of Gazans. No one should spend the bulk of their time arguing technical definitions between starvation and pervasive hunger. The situation is dire, and it is deadly. Nor should we accept arguments that because Hamas is the primary reason many Gazans are either starving or on the verge of starving, that the Jewish State is not also culpable in this human disaster. The primary moral response must begin with anguished hearts in the face of such a large-scale human tragedy.

Our tradition teaches that all people are created b’tzelem Elohim—in the image of God. One consequence of this is the moral priority, which is affirmed throughout the Bible and rabbinic tradition, of feeding the hungry—both for the individual and for the self-governing Jewish community.

More than a few members of the current Israeli government have publicly called for Israel to decimate the Gaza strip. The most recent was Heritage Minister Amichai Eliyahu who, on Thursday lauded the Israeli government for “racing ahead for Gaza to be wiped out.” He added: “Thank God, we are wiping out this evil.” Of equal concern are far-right Israeli politicians who advocate for Israel to permanently push most Gazans from much of Gaza and replace them with Jewish settlements. We condemn all such statements. They do not represent Jewish values nor those embodied in the Zionist vision that produced Israel’s Declaration of Independence.

Despite PM Netanyahu’s calls to ignore these full members of his cabinet, their presence in this government has consistently morally compromised Israel’s actions.

Starving Gazan civilians neither will bring Israel the “total victory” over Hamas it seeks, nor can it be justified by Jewish values or humanitarian law. It’s hard to imagine that this tragic approach will bring home the 50 remaining hostages, including the 20 whom we pray are still alive.

It’s imperative that the Government of Israel ensures that the recently announced plans to deliver humanitarian aid succeed as Israel works with international partners to ensure its safe and sustained delivery and do whatever possible to reduce or eliminate the shootings and other injuries sustained at food distribution centers. We applaud Israel’s green light for foreign nations to resume providing humanitarian aid to the Gaza population desperate for food and are confident that they will do all they can to ensure that such aid does not fall into the hands of Hamas.

As Israel has effective control of 70% of Gaza, with the intent to remain in significant swaths of it, even if only temporarily, it should be directly involved, facilitate and cooperate with the international community, international humanitarian NGOs, and regional friends, to take urgently needed actions, such as these suggested by Israeli Reform rabbi and Member of Knesset Gilad Kariv:

• To prevent the alarming number of civilian deaths in and around the food and humanitarian aid distribution sites.

• Opening a significant number of food distribution centers at various locations across the Gaza Strip.

• Large-scale entry of infant formula (especially liquid formula) and ensuring safe delivery to both functioning medical centers and the few remaining international aid facilities.

• Establishing secure methods—potentially through cooperation with regional countries—for delivering food supplies to aid organizations and international agencies.

• Resuming sufficient water supply to population centers in Gaza, in accordance with international health standards.

• Authorizing and assisting in the supply of medications, the establishment of field hospitals and clinics operated by remaining Palestinian medical staff, by foreign governments and by international agencies, especially in areas where hospitals have ceased functioning.

Finally, while it is imperative that Israel and the U.S. resume diplomacy to bring home all hostages and end this war, denying basic humanitarian aid crosses a moral line. Blocking food, water, medicine, and power—especially for children—is indefensible. Let us not allow our grief to harden into indifference, nor our love for Israel to blind us to the cries of the vulnerable. Let us rise to the moral challenge of this moment.

“We all want to change the world” – by Kareem Abdul-Jabaar – A Review

01 Sunday Jun 2025

Posted by rabbijohnrosove in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

antisemitism, gaza, Israel, palestine, politics

Kareem Abdul-Jabaar’s newly published book We all want to change the world – My Journey through Social Justice Movements from the 1960s to Today is a sweeping, thoughtful, self-revelatory, honest, and inspiring review of most of the major social justice movements and human rights challenges in the United States since the 1950s when Kareem was coming of age as a African American athlete in New York City. One of the greatest basketball players in the history of the NBA, Kareem is now among the most prolific writers, probing thinkers and public intellectuals in America.

I read Kareem’s Substack newsletters from start to finish each time he publishes (twice weekly) and I find him always smart, rational, intellectually honest, thorough in his research, moral, and entertaining with his short videos of extraordinary athletic feats, musical selections, and cultural moments. Just as his Substack newsletter is worth reading, so is his newest book.

Kareem covers the impact on American society of the movements for Free Speech, Civil Rights, anti-Vietnam War, Women’s Liberation and Gay Liberation, and the cultural, emotional and psychological mindsets that spawned the courageous leadership that furthered human rights and opportunities in the United States for discriminated groups of Americans.

Kareem describes his personal mantra as that inspired by civil rights activist Fannie Lou Hamer’s adage: “No one is free unless everyone is free,” and what Dr. King said in another way: “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.”

As a young black man growing up in the 1950s and 1960s in New York City, becoming a famous athlete, meeting Dr. King, Mohammad Ali, and other leading black sports, entertainment and human rights figures, and reading constantly from the time he was a teen-ager, the shy, intellectual, self-reflective and compassionate young man felt compelled to think not only about himself and his athletic career and the moral compromises that many fellow black athletes felt they had to make in order to further their careers, but about every individual struggling for dignity beyond the stereotypes and cultural definitions that oppressed them.

Kareem wrote:

“Writing [the chapter on Civil Rights as My Gateway Movement] was especially challenging for me. As I chronicled the history of decade after decade of civil rights abuses and the martyrs who gave up their lives in pursuit of the freedoms already promised by our Constitution, I felt the rising heat of frustration and anger from my younger days. I needed to take frequent breaks to remind myself that frustration and anger by themselves accomplish nothing. Injustice is fueled by indifference, but passion without a plan is just as destructive. For me, the fiery passion of my youth needed to be channeled in order for me to do my part to bring about justice.”

This book is well-researched and well-written, and it lays out the historical facts and events of each of the human rights movements Kareem discusses in detail. He first presents those events historically, then dives into the emotional, social, and psychological challenges the leaders and followers of each movement confronted. For me, about three years younger than Kareem (age 78), I remember so much of what he describes, and I appreciate his insights about the forces that propelled the leadership of each movement to do what they did, as well as the baked-in cultural norms that reflected (and still reflects) the thinking of massive numbers of Americans.

Among other self-revelatory sections of the book, Kareem describes himself as a feminist. He wrote:

“As a Black teenager growing up in New York City, I loved books, movies, television, and music. Looking back on all that I was exposed to, I see now how those popular art forms conspired to produce a pounding thrum of dangerous misogyny, an insistent earworm that ran through my generation as it had so many generations before. With this evolving women’s movement, as more and more voices joined the chorus protesting misogyny, our heads were cleared enough to choose for ourselves. That’s how it was for me.”

In his epilogue, Kareem confessed:

“The biggest challenge I had in writing this book was the frequent breaks I had to take due to the build-up of frustration and anger. Again and again in my research, I saw the same pattern: basic human rights denied, indignities and disrespect piled on, and the refusal of oppressors to acknowledge why they were wrong. The worst was the complicity of so many people who disagreed with the discrimination in principle but who were too complacent to act. They might justify their collusion with ‘What can I do?’ but they already know the answer. They just don’t like it.”  

He concludes the book discussing the ongoing need for open and public protest in all the areas he discussed:

“The Founders enshrined the right to protest in our Constitution. They did that because they knew that the forces of self-interest and corruption would always try and to subvert the ideals of democracy they laid out.”

Kareem can be forgiven for the human rights issues he did not include in his book. However, there is one that Kareem does not discuss in this volume – the oldest of all hatreds, antisemitism. I’ve wondered why he didn’t discuss it specifically since it has become a major issue in North America, on college and university campuses, and around the world especially since Hamas’s brutal attack, murder and rape of 1200 Israelis and others on October 7, 2023 in Southern Israel and reactions to Israel and Jews as a consequence of the ensuing war between Hamas and Israel.

On October 9, 2023, two days after the Hamas attack, Kareem wrote in his Substack newsletter of his support of Israel. He condemned Hamas categorically, and elsewhere he described antisemitism as “especially heinous.” Kareem was the 2022 winner of Canada’s “Friends of Simon Wiesenthal Center’s first Ally Against Anti-Semitism Award,” so his pro-Jewish and pro-Israel bona fides are undisputed. Given Kareem’s 1.1 million Substack readers and the likely large number of people of color, athletes, and liberal-left readers who will read this book (as well as interested moderates and conservatives), I would have appreciated his discussion of antisemitism, its nature and history going back thousands of years and reemerging today in the United States, especially in this post-October 7th period in which so many on the far left publicly have identified with Hamas against Israel and Zionism and so many on the far right who openly court and identify with neo-Nazis and right-wing extremists, including the sitting President of the United States.

Hamas is among the most brutal, undemocratic, unenlightened, Jew-hating, extremist Muslim terrorist organizations in the world. It is one thing for decent people to want peace and justice for the Palestinian people in some kind of a demilitarized state of their own alongside a secure and democratic Jewish State of Israel, but it is something else entirely to support Hamas and its call for a free “Palestine from the River to the Sea.” That position means the destruction of the State of Israel and the murder of Jews. It is antisemitic Jew-hatred.  

There is a strong human rights case to be made about this oldest of hatreds that would have merited Kareem’s inclusion of a discussion of antisemitism in his book. Historically, the evidence is clear that in every country in which Jews have been discriminated against, attacked and accused of corrupting the soul of a people or nation, human rights generally and democracy specifically have been diminished and/or destroyed. To me, antisemitism would have been an obvious chapter to write about. I’m disappointed that Kareem didn’t take the opportunity to address Jew-hatred head-on, especially because I know he understands what antisemitism is and its “heinous” character. It was a missed opportunity to educate those very groups and individuals in which antisemitism has taken root and found a home in recent years on both the far left and the far right.

Wiping Clean the “Human Stain” – A Pesach Message

10 Thursday Apr 2025

Posted by rabbijohnrosove in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

gaza, hamas, Israel, palestine, politics

Fear, anger, outrage, disgust, rage, anxiety, worry – these are among the feelings millions of Americans have been experiencing since Trump took control of the federal government, appointed incompetent sycophants to his Cabinet, began firing hundreds of thousands of federal workers, dismembering whole government departments and agencies, crashing the economy, obliterating the life savings of millions of seniors, threatening America’s social safety net, and wrecking the international global trading system.

And then there’s the endless war in Gaza that PM Netanyahu refuses to end thereby callously forsaking the lives of the remaining hostages, withholding desperately needed humanitarian aid from the most vulnerable Palestinian civilians in Gaza, and allowing more killings in Gaza and the destruction of Palestinian lives and villages in the West Bank.

In his novel The Human Stain, Philip Roth wrote cynically:

“…we leave a stain, we leave a trail, we leave our imprint. Impurity, cruelty, abuse, error, … – there’s no other way to be here. Nothing to do with disobedience. Nothing to do with grace or salvation or redemption. It’s in everyone. Indwelling. Inherent, Defining. The stain that is there before its mark. Without the sign it is there. The stain so intrinsic it doesn’t require a mark. The stain that precedes disobedience, that impasses disobedience and perplexes all explanation and understanding. It’s why all the cleansing is a job. A barbaric joke at that. The fantasy of purity is appalling. It’s insane. What is the quest to purify, if not more impurity?” (p. 242)

Roth’s dystopic characterization of the human condition is soul-crushing and contrary to fundamental Jewish values promoting goodness, justice, compassion, and human decency.

Years ago at a convention of Reform Rabbis in Jerusalem that met between Purim and Pesach, Yossi Klein Halevi offered this teaching about the truths at the core of each holiday. Purim, he said, reminds Jews that there are indeed evil actors in the world whose hatred of our people threatens us and we cannot be naïve about their worst intentions. Pesach reminds us, he said, that as a people who have long known enslavement and suffering must never forget that it’s our duty to remain compassionate despite the cruelty around us.

Pesach reminds us also that we need each other, our families, friends, and community as we face the multitude of moral challenges before us. When we open the door for Elijah, we’re reminded that not all is lost, that hope abides despite the human stain that leaves its corrosive residue in the heart, and that it’s our moral and Jewish duty to act justly, to love mercy, and to pursue peace.

Our role today, along with the millions of Americans who marched last weekend against the despotic over-reach of this corrupt and heartless American President, is to be, like them, on the right side of history. And it is to be grateful for the thousands of lawyers and law firms, the hundreds of college and university presidents and faculties, and the many decent public servants in Congress, state capitals and local communities across the United States who are resisting tyranny.

As Jews who love Israel, it is our place to act in solidarity with the hundreds of thousands of Israeli demonstrators marching weekly and calling for an immediate end to Israel’s longest war, the return of the hostages, the restoration of humanitarian aid for Palestinian civilians in Gaza, and on behalf of Israeli democracy.  

When the ancient Israelites escaped Egypt with Pharaoh’s troops in pursuit, they came to the Sea of Reeds, a natural blockade to their liberation. Moses turned to God in prayer and asked for Divine agency. However, Nachshon ben Aminadav took history into his own hands and leaped into the sea, whereupon the Holy One took note of Nachshon’s courage and parted the waters that the people might escape upon dry land.

The Babylonian Talmud (Shabbat 54b), many centuries later, reflected on the moral responsibility of our people to take action whenever they confronted injustice, corruption, and hard-heartedness:

“If a person can protest the misdeeds of one’s household, yet does not, that one becomes guilty with them. If a person can protest the deeds of one’s towns-people, and does not, that one is guilty with them. If a person can protest the deeds of the entire world, and does not, that one is guilty with them.”

Chag Pesach Sameach!

For my Jewish readers – Have you voted yet?

23 Sunday Mar 2025

Posted by rabbijohnrosove in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

gaza, Israel, palestine, politics, zionism

At a time when democracy in Israel is being challenged by the most extreme right-wing messianic and autocratic-ruling-coalition-government in the history of the state, we American Reform Jews who care about Israel have an opportunity to make our voices heard in protest. Voting in the World Zionist Congress (WZC) election is our opportunity to take a stand for democracy and pluralism in Israel.

I have written twice on this blog already about the singular importance of this election. I am doing so again because our voting for the Reform Slate is one way for Diaspora Jewry to participate in the future of democracy in Israel. Contrast our intent to that of our ultra-Orthodox opponents who have pledged to get 100,000 votes in order to defund Israeli Reform Judaism and turn back the clock on Israeli democracy, pluralism and peace. 

Israel’s leaders are watching closely to see who is going to emerge as the predominant voice of American Jewry – and it must be us!

If we Reform American Jews vote in large numbers in this election, we can directly impact the amount of resources and funding for our Israeli Reform synagogues, rabbis, values, and advocacy work on behalf of democracy and human rights in Israel and Diaspora communities. The Israeli Reform Movement does not receive the kind of funding that the Orthodox and Ultra-Orthodox movements receive from the government, and so our standing in the World Zionist Congress can make a very significant impact on the financial health of the Israeli Reform Movement.

I am running for a seat in the WZC, and I ask for your vote – BUT, your vote isn’t only for me. It’s for our values to help ensure religious pluralism, women’s rights, LGBTQ+ inclusion, and a pathway to peace that includes the return of all hostages.

To be eligible to vote in 39th World Zionist Congress you must:

  • Be Jewish (and not subscribe to another religion)
  • Be 18 years or older by June 30, 2025
  • Be a U.S. citizen or a legal permanent resident in the U.S.
  • Maintain your primary residence in the U.S.
  • Accept the Jerusalem Program (the Zionist movement platform)
  • Have not voted in the November 2022 Knesset election (and will not vote in any future Knesset election which may be held prior July 28, 2025)

To register to vote, pay the $5 administrative fee, go to https://www.vote4reform.org/

I ASK FOR YOUR VOTE IN THE WORLD ZIONIST CONGRESS ELECTION – MARCH 10 – MAY 4

04 Tuesday Mar 2025

Posted by rabbijohnrosove in Uncategorized

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

gaza, Israel, palestine, politics, zionism

I am running to be a delegate representing the United States Reform Jewish Movement in the World Zionist Congress, and I ask for your vote .

The following explains why it is important that every American Jew over the age of 18 votes for the Reform Movement Slate in this election.

When I served as the National Chair of the Association of Reform Zionists of America (ARZA) representing 1.5 million United States Reform Jews, I had the honor of having a seat in the World Zionist Organization, the Jewish Agency for Israel, and the Jewish National Fund, and that experience persuaded me how important it is that we in the American Reform Movement do very well in this election, which means that as many Reform Jews vote as possible.

The following should answer questions you might have about the election. If you have questions after reading this blog, please ask and I’ll respond.

What is the World Zionist Congress (WZC)?

The World Zionist Congress is a central nongovernmental institution in Israel. Often called “The Parliament of the Jewish People.” From the era of Theodor Herzl, the father of the Zionist movement, the WZC was the pre-statehood governing body representing the entirety of the Jewish world. The WZC convenes every five years to bring together representatives from Jewish communities around the world to decide key issues affecting the Jewish people in Israel and globally. The Congress elects the leadership that sets policies and influences the allocation of significant funding of about $1 billion annually. It plays a crucial role in supporting activities worldwide that promote Jewish identity and combat antisemitism.

What does the Reform Jewish Movement have to do with the WZC?

While the Reform Jewish Movement is the largest Jewish denomination in North America, we are a minority in Israel of just 8% – partly due to the lack of Israeli government funding in comparison to Orthodox communities in the Jewish state. Your vote will help to bring funds that are crucial to survive, thrive, and further our core values of democracy, freedom, pluralism, and security, and champion a different vision of what it means to be Jewish in the Jewish State. The Israeli Reform Movement includes more than 50 congregations, more than 140 Israeli trained Reform Rabbis (women and men), an active youth movement, pre-military educational programs, two kibbutzim, a renowned high school in Haifa, and many nursery schools and elementary schools all of which promote liberal Judaismand represents our liberal Jewish values as a counter-balance to the illiberal values that Israel’s right-wing promotes.

Where does the money come from? Where does it go?

The World Zionist Organization receives its funding from various Zionist institutions, donations, and partnerships. A major financial pillar, the Jewish National Fund (KKL-JNF) generates revenue from leasing and developments in Israel. Additional funds come from the Jewish Agency for Israel, donations, membership dues, and indirect state funding from Israel.

THE IMPORTANCE OF YOUR VOTING

Why is voting important? What’s really at stake?

Our representation in the WZC helps protect fundamental rights for all Israelis and Reform Jewish communities. It also prevents extremist factions from implementing policies that oppose our core shared values of democracy, freedom, pluralism, and security. The ultra-Orthodox and ultra-Nationalist movements are using the levers provided through these institutions – and power gained in the World Zionist Congress elections – to advance their extremist agenda, including: rejecting our conversions and questioning the authenticity of our children’s Jewish identity, stripping Israeli Reform clergy and communities of their rights and funding, advancing anti-democratic policies, and rolling back gains for LGBTQ+ rights.

What has been the impact of the Reform Movement at the WZC in the past? 

Our work has proven crucial for Israel’s secure, democratic and inclusive nature and for marginalized individuals within Israeli society.

● We ensured that over $4,000,000 a year ($20 million over 5 years) of financial support goes to the Reform movement in Israel thereby allowing it to significantly expand its reach to Israelis who seek a liberal Jewish community for themselves and their families.

● Our leaders have stood up for a secure Israel, directly preventing settlement building and advancing policies that align with our liberal Jewish values.

● We have passed key resolutions for equality, transparency, and pluralism.

● We helped guarantee LGBTQ+ rights for same-sex partners of fallen soldiers

● We battle for gender equity in Israel

The work of the WZC:

● Supports Reform rabbis and congregations;

● Offers humanitarian aid, inclusive housing for people with disabilities, and programs that empower women;

● Provides counseling and other services for over 20,000 Reform Jews in Israel each year;

● Fights discrimination among marginalized groups of Israeli society through the Israel Religious Action Center (IRAC), representing up to 500 people a year in court.

THE VOTING PROCESS

When does the vote start?

Voting runs from March 10 – May 4, 2025!

Who is eligible to Vote?

In order to vote, one must be:

● 18 or over.

● Self-identified as Jewish

● Live in the United States

● Pay $5 administrative fee

How can I vote?

You can vote online or by mail starting March 10 – May 4 at ZIONISTELECTION.COM. Note that voting requires a $5 administrative fee to help fund the cost of the election. Payments can be made by credit card, e-check, PayPal, Venmo, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. The payment serves to prevent fraud by making sure that individuals are voting and are only doing so once.

Why Vote Reform and not for one of the other pro-democracy slates?

● The Vote Reform Slate (the THIRD SLATE ON THE BALLOT) has successfully and consistently represented Reform values in the WZC for decades. Because we represent the largest pro-democracy mandate from the United States, we are uniquely situated within the infrastructure of Israel’s National Institutions (The WZO, The Jewish Agency for Israel, and the Jewish National Fund) to stand up against far-right settler, messianic and anti-democratic extremism. Our work as a movement has proven crucial in defending a secure and democratic Israel:

● We ensured that over $4,000,000 a year ($20 million over 5 years) of financial support goes to the Reform movement in Israel, allowing it to significantly expand its reach.

● Our leaders have stood up for a secure Israel, directly preventing settlement building and advancing policies that align with our values.

● We have passed key resolutions for equality, transparency, and pluralism.

● We helped guarantee LGBTQ+ rights for same-sex partners of fallen soldiers.

● We fight discrimination among marginalized groups of Israeli society through the Israel Religious Action Center, representing up to 500 people a year in court.

ONCE AGAIN – I ASK FOR YOUR VOTE. PLEASE REGISTER NOW OR ON MARCH 10, PAY THE NOMINAL ADMINISTRATIVE FEE OF $5 PER PERSON, AND HELP SECURE THE WELL-BEING OF LIBERAL REFORM JUDAISM IN ISRAEL AND AROUND THE WORLD.

American Jewish Identity Challenges after October 7th

24 Monday Feb 2025

Posted by rabbijohnrosove in Uncategorized

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

gaza, Israel, palestine, politics, zionism

Introductory Notes: I was invited on Sunday, February 23rd by the Washington Hebrew Congregation in our nation’s capital and co-sponsored by the National Jewish Book Council to deliver the Amram Lecture in its 70th anniversary year to discuss the identity of liberal American Jews, as well as my most recently published book From the West to the East – A Memoir of a Liberal American Rabbi – https://westofwestcenter.com/product/from-the-west-to-the-east/ and at Amazon. This was the first time I had returned to WHC since I served there as Associate Rabbi from 1986-1988. It was a kind of home-coming and its Senior Rabbi Susan Shankman presided with her customary grace and intelligence. This talk and the Q and A session following was recorded and will be available in the coming days. I will post the link when it is available.

This is what I said:

So much has happened in the Jewish world, 38 years since I began my service with you. I want to speak with you this morning about the historic challenges facing Israel and the American Jewish community today, especially since October 7th, and share some of the broad themes and inflection-point stories in my life and rabbinate that I write about in my Memoir that I believe have universal take-aways for us all.           

Today is the 506th day since October 7th. The trauma of that day remains palpable in both Israel and for so many of us as well. The murder by Hamas of the Bibas family of two small children and their mother has renewed the trauma and rage felt by Jews around the world. Israeli society, despite the release of some hostages, is still frozen by the horrors of that day, arguably the deadliest and most traumatic day for Jews since the Holocaust. Border communities bear the scars of destruction and displacement. The trauma of war affects virtually every Israeli in how they relate to their families and with friends, with fellow Jews around the world, with the Palestinians and their Arab neighbors.

As much as we Jews are thrilled that some of the hostages are home, we worry about the well-being of the remaining hostages and we fear that this deal will fall apart any day. Despite the joy of seeing the freed hostages reunited with their families, there’s something morally repulsive and offensive in the fact that these innocent Jews and others who were stolen from their bedrooms and from fields filled with music on that day were exchanged for those very Hamas terrorists who committed atrocities against our people or who support the murderous Hamas intentions.

To see the starving and tortured faces of the three hostages released a few weeks ago recalled the old black and white photographs taken when the camps were liberated which is why President Trump’s ‘solution’ for Gaza was acceptable to Israel’s far right wing. His plan mainstreams for the first time in Israel’s history the idea of “transfer,” a euphemism for ethnic cleansing, without any concern for the rights of the Palestinians living there, most of whom are not terrorists, nor were members of Hamas, and are suffering. His plan threatens the Israeli-Egyptian and Israeli-Jordanian peace agreements, the future of the Abraham Accords, the lives of the remaining hostages, and feeds the most extremist, messianic, and illiberal trends in Israeli society.

Just as Israelis find themselves at a significant crossroad in their history, so too do we American Jews find ourselves at a significant cross-road. For the first time in American Jewish history since the founding of the State of Israel, many liberal American Jews who love the Jewish state have been deeply disturbed not only by what happened on October 7th but also by Israel’s overwhelming and massive military response against Hamas that killed and injured so many thousands of Palestinian civilians and essentially destroyed Gaza. I was one of them, however, in fairness to Israel it’s important for us here to understand that this war, the longest in Israel’s history by far, was a response to what the Israeli government and army most feared would happen immediately after October 7th.

Israel’s leaders believed then that they were fighting for the existence of the Jewish state itself. They knew that Hamas intended to expand its attack, that there were realistic threats also by Hezbollah and Iran to join the war, and that a sympathetic uprising could ignite in the West Bank forcing Israel to fight simultaneously on three fronts. It was unclear then whether Israel could meet those threats. Hamas was organized and executing a plan that it had developed over many years. The IDF was disorganized. The Israeli army command believed that it had to distribute immediately its authority to a far lower level of officers than it had ever done before. That decision reduced the IDF’s customary safeguards to protect as much as feasibly possible Palestinian civilians who were used by Hamas as human shields, a massive war crime on top of what Hamas did in Southern Israel, massacring 1200 Israelis, raping and taking as hostage 250 more.

The army command believed that Israel had to fight with overwhelming fire power to disrupt Hamas’s chain of command and reach its leaders hiding everywhere under homes, apartment buildings, schools, community centers, hospitals, and mosques. If Israel didn’t succeed in disrupting Hamas immediately and demonstrating to Hezbollah and Iran how capable the IDF still was, Israel’s military and government leadership feared that tens of thousands of Israelis would be killed.

Both Israelis and American Jews are only now beginning to ask about the horrible impact this war has had on both Israelis and Palestinian civilians and what long-term psychological damage has been done on both peoples. We’re trying here in Diaspora communities as well to figure out where exactly we stand as American Jews and how much we want to say and reveal publicly about our fears and moral concerns in the war and the illiberal trends that are taking over Israel.

Taking a 10,000 foot view, the significance of this period in Jewish history is unparalleled in the modern era except for the three years from 1945 to 1948 when the Jewish people went from our lowest nadir after the Shoah to the establishment of Israel. That wide swing of the pendulum is testimony to the Jewish people’s durability and ability to survive, adapt and thrive after catastrophic events. Perhaps, the tragedy of October 7th and Israel’s turnaround military successes will have a strong deterrent impact on the perceptions of Israel by its enemies.

Despite Israel’s military successes, only a completed cease-fire and hostage deal will bring October 7th to an end and enable Israelis to begin a process of healing. But, any peace deal must include also a pathway to a demilitarized Palestinian state of some kind in Gaza and the West Bank in the context of a larger Middle East peace agreement that includes Israel and Saudi Arabia and all its moderate Arab neighbors.

That larger deal won’t be easy to attain because right-wing Israeli political parties and the extremist settler movement want to keep the war going as long as possible to enable Israel to annex Gaza and the West Bank into Israel. Should those extremist and messianic forces have their way, more terrorism and more war with the Palestinians and Islamic extremists will be inevitable and Israel’s international standing will remain diminished for decades to come.

Thankfully, polling of Israelis today suggests that the grip of the extremist right wing on the Israeli government is weakening. Sixty to seventy percent of all Israelis say they want all three stages of the agreement with Hamas to go forward with the return of the hostages and a permanent end to the war.

Even if and when that were to happen, there are immense residual problems facing Israel that have to be confronted and resolved including the massive humanitarian crisis in Gaza, the lack of an Israeli consensus about the role of the Palestinian Authority in the future governance of Gaza and the West Bank, Israel’s severely damaged international standing, what we in the American Jewish community think and feel about Israel and Zionism, and the dramatic rise here in antisemitism.

Among the greatest and immediate internal challenges facing Israel is that it has yet to set up a State Commission of Inquiry into what happened leading up to October 7th and Israel’s conduct in the war. Israel needs a power-house authority to undertake this inquiry to restore the people’s confidence that every lesson has been learned, that leadership failings are exposed, conclusions are drawn, and whether military excesses and war crimes were in fact committed.

In considering Israel’s culpability, however, we Jews who love Israel have to be able to distinguish between two kinds of criticism leveled against Israel’s conduct of the war.

There’s criticism from Israel’s friends that the IDF went too far, bombed Gaza too heavily using thousands of those huge 2000-pound dumb-bombs that destroyed entire apartment buildings and neighborhoods to get at Hamas command sites deep underground thus causing far too much damage to life and property, and that Israeli commanders and soldiers in the heat of battle crossed red lines against international moral standards of war. Israelis need to address this legitimate criticism from Israel’s friends and not characterize it as either anti-Israel or antisemitic.

The second kind of criticism is very different and comes from those who believe that the Jewish State has no moral legitimacy, is a colonial and foreign entity in the Middle East, has no right to exist and therefore no right to defend itself. That criticism clearly is based upon antisemitism.

Despite the loss of hundreds of young Israeli soldiers, the suffering of the hostages and their families, and the massive carnage in Gaza and the loss of life and property in the Strip, there have been a few positive things that have come from this war for Israel. Immediately after October 7th, Israel’s civil society came together from across all political and religious lines to support one another following a year of intensive demonstrations and hatred that brought hundreds of thousands of Israelis into the streets and tore apart the fabric of Israeli society as a consequence of the government’s proposed Judicial Reform efforts, or over-haul, or Judicial coup de etat – however one characterizes it. And hundreds of moving Hebrew songs have been written focusing on war and peace, hopelessness and hope.

In Diaspora communities $1.4 billion was raised for Israel representing the single largest set of contributions on behalf of Israel in our history, and 300,000 Jews and friends of Israel came together here in Washington in solidarity with Israel, the largest Jewish demonstration since the 1987 Soviet Jewry rally on the Mall.

All of that is a source of inspiration and pride. However, the rise of antisemitism here and around the world has been dramatic. Between March and May of 2024, Jewish students on 147 campuses in North America were under attack. The ADL counted 10,000 incidents against Jews representing an increase of 200 percent over the year before. In a new survey released three weeks ago by the ADL and Hillel International, 83 percent of all North American Jewish students have experienced or witnessed antisemitism firsthand since October 7, 2023.

An American Jewish Committee study reported that over 50 percent of us won’t show in public spaces anything that identifies us as Jews including wearing kippot, the Magen David, dog tags with the names of Israeli hostages, and yellow hostage ribbons.

At the same time, many American Jews have experienced a passionate reconnection to Zionism, Israel and their Jewish identity. However, 42 percent of young Jews under 35 have had difficulty finding common ground with the Jewish State. Some, though a minority, now say they’re anti-Zionists.

Antisemitism comes from both the far right politically and the far left. The far right doesn’t consider American Jews to be part of white America and that we’re foreign interlopers here with far too much power and influence in government, politics, the media, banking, business, and entertainment – classic antisemitic canards. The far left considers us to be part of white America and in league with right-wing colonialists around the world that oppress peoples of color most especially in America and Israel.

It’s unclear what impact October 7th and the war will ultimately have on each of us and on the character of our traditional Jewish institutions, most especially our synagogues, religious schools and day schools. In the early weeks and months of the war, many Jews sought out the organized Jewish community for themselves and their children. Many non-Jews were choosing to convert to Judaism in numbers greater than we’ve experienced in a generation. More American Jews began reading books, attending classes and on-line seminars that helped them better understand Zionism, Israel, and Middle East politics and history.  

In the Reform Movement, many of my rabbinic colleagues, however, have confessed either that they don’t know enough or don’t understand well enough what’s really happening in Israel to be able to publicly speak and teach with confidence about it. Many who do love and understand Israel have feared for their positions if they spoke critically about Israel’s conduct in the war. They’ve worried that conservative wealthy and influential congregants will take exception to what they say and advocate for their dismissal. Too many synagogues have become unsafe places where rabbis and congregants are unable to discuss and debate openly the wide range of opposing views that exist in our community concerning Israel, Zionism, antisemitism, the war, the Israeli government, illiberal trends in Israeli and American societies, and the Israeli-Palestinian and Israeli-Arab conflicts.

We don’t know how our American and Israeli Jewish identities will evolve over time, but my sense is that we Jews are in a deeply troubling but also transformative era. Whereas in years past, Israelis were happy simply to take Diaspora Jewish dollars and seek American Jewish political support for Israel’s security needs, in a recent Israeli poll, 80 percent of Israeli Jews now feel strongly that the Israel-Diaspora relationship is important personally to them.

I characterize myself as a liberal American Reform Zionist and a lover of Israel and the Jewish people. But, even as I identify so closely with Israelis – many of whom are among my dearest friends – I’ve been confused why so many Israelis haven’t empathized nearly enough with the suffering of the Palestinians in Gaza.

Rabbi Donniel Hartman and Yossi Klein HaLevi of the Shalom Hartman Institute in Jerusalem raised this issue last month in their weekly podcast For Heaven’s Sake. They noted that amongst the many challenges Israeli Jews have faced is that in the midst of the war they felt no significant moral angst about the suffering of Gazans because they themselves felt victimized first by Hamas’ attack on October 7th and then by the world’s remarkably quick turn-about against Israel once the IDF began fighting only days later.

Donniel and Yossi explained that victims generally respond to their enemies with fear, anxiety, rage, hostility, and a desire for revenge, and from that embattled position they morally justify themselves in whatever they do. I confess that in the initial months of the war, I felt the same way. These terrible effects of feeling victimized explain not only why Israeli society and the Israeli media did not focus on the destruction of Gaza and the huge loss of life there during the war, but why Palestinian society too has historically tolerated and embraced terrorism as a legitimate tool and moral response against Israel and the Jewish people. As victims, Palestinians living under Israel’s harsh occupation in the West Bank and formerly in Gaza until Israel unilaterally withdrew 20 years ago believe they’re justified in committing even the most vicious crimes without moral consequence.

At the beginning of the war, a colleague and friend called me distraught because his college-age daughter had joined the Jewish Voice for Peace, an anti-Israel, anti-Zionist and anti-nationalist Jewish organization. She claimed to want no part of Israel in her life and even expressed the view to her father, a rabbi and Reform Zionist, that Israel should never have been created. My colleague, as you might imagine, was deeply upset and didn’t know what to say to her. He asked me what I thought. A number of my congregants called me as well (though I’m retired they called me anyway) with the same question about their college age and twenty-something kids.

You might remember a letter signed by hundreds of young Reform Jews, children of rabbis and alumni of our American Reform Jewish summer camps that was published in the Jewish press that accused us older Reform Jewish leadership with hypocrisy – that we taught them liberal universal Jewish values but now support an illiberal and immoral Jewish state.

That letter provoked op-eds, sermons and conversations throughout our movement about how we Jewish leaders have failed to educate our people and especially our young Jews about Israel and Zionism.

To my colleague and congregants, I said the following:

“First – these are your kids. Your relationship with them is what’s most important now. Don’t say or do anything that will alienate them from you. Love them a lot which means listening to them without your having to instruct or correct them. Recognize that we’re all struggling in this new era of American Jewish history. Take a 10,000 foot perspective and remember that they’re at the beginning of their adult journeys as Jews and Americans and that they’ll likely evolve and change their thinking over time just as we’ve done over the course of our lives. You’ve instilled in them the Jewish values that are important to you. This isn’t the end of their engagement with Jewish life or in their relationship with Israel. Keep the door open to continuing a conversation with them. They already know, most likely, how you feel and what you believe about Israel. You don’t have to persuade them now about anything. Just listen and tell them that you respect them and love them. If they’re open to reading about why Israel matters to the American Jewish community and what liberal Reform Zionism has to offer them and Israel as a direct response to the illiberal trends in Israeli society, there are books that deal directly with these challenges.”

The greater question confronting us here now is what do we do to better educate ourselves and our young people about Israel and Zionism? That’s the $64 million question.

The best thing we can do is to go there individually or in congregational groups and meet Israelis face to face from the right, left and center, with Palestinian-Israeli citizens and Palestinians living under occupation in the West Bank, with Israeli and Palestinian journalists, with members of Knesset, and with our Reform movement rabbis and leadership, and especially with the leadership of the Israel Religious Action Center whose liberal values we share and who are working every day to counter the extremist actions of the government and on behalf of pluralism, equality and democracy in Israeli society.

Taking a longer view, there are a number of questions we need to be asking ourselves, debating, and striving to find consensus. Those questions include:

  • How we regard the impact of October 7th and the war on our Jewish lives and institutions?
  • How we memorialize what occurred on October 7th without identifying as victims?
  • What it means to belong to the Jewish people and to have a Jewish state?
  • How we look at the world today beyond our Jewish agenda and act on behalf of other minorities and groups who may feel towards us Jews as colonialists and interlopers?
  • How we regard ourselves as a distinct “other” in our Diaspora communities?
  • How we frame how others ought to be regarding us as American Jews who love Israel?
  • How we rebuild trust in our Jewish institutions and even in many of our clergy and teachers who some young people regard with a measure of suspicion and distrust because we haven’t been honest enough or knowledgeable enough about Israel, Jewish peoplehood, and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict when they grew up?
  • And finally, how we understand anti-Zionism, anti-Israel sentiment, and antisemitism today, and what we do about it?

From the 1990s, the organized American Jewish community worked to reestablish inter-group relationships with the African-American, Latino, Asian, Christian, and Muslim communities in America. We worked on writing textbooks and developing curricula together, and we attempted to influence how other groups understood Israel and the American Jewish experience. Today, many of those efforts have been vacated. The American Jewish community is consequently in a shifting place, and though October 7th and the war contributed mightily to that shift, the events of the past 16 months were not the starting points of that shift.

There’s still, of course, so much that’s positive for us to celebrate about the American Jewish experience and opportunities to address the challenges I’ve mentioned. Our financial resources are great. We have many talented rabbinic, cantorial, academic, educational, professional, lay and political leaders helping us forge a new path forward.

Our message as American liberal non-Orthodox Zionists and as lovers of the people and State of Israel has to be clear and unrelenting – DON’T GIVE UP ON ISRAEL. We have a moral Jewish duty to fight for Israel despite her imperfections just as we fight for America despite its imperfections. My friend and colleague Rabbi Josh Weinberg, the Vice President for Israel and Reform Zionism at the Union for Reform Judaism, put it well with these words: “We have a duty to fight for Israel’s right to be the only Jewish state in the world and for Jews to be a free people thriving in our historic Homeland without always having to live by the sword. We liberal American Zionists also have a moral duty to fight for Israel to live up to the values articulated in Israel’s Declaration of Independence. We have the duty also to fight against those who constantly defame and delegitimize Israel, who unfairly criticize her and judge her by unreasonable double standards.”

As Reform Jews, we have the duty to join with our growing Israeli Reform movement in its fight for religious pluralism, democracy, equality, the return of all the hostages, and to pursue a pathway to peace with the Palestinians, the Arab and moderate Muslim world.

One of the most important ways for us American Reform Jews to do all of this is to vote in next month’s World Zionist Congress elections for the Reform ARZA slate. Rabbi Shankman is prospective delegate, as am I, and I hope you will vote in large numbers so that we will do very well in this election. Our liberal Jewish values are at stake in the National Institutions, the World Zionist Organization, the Jewish Agency for Israel, and the Jewish National Fund. The World Zionist Organization dispenses annually $1 billion dollars and since our Israeli Reform institutions are discriminated against by the government of Israel, having a large representation in the World Zionist Organization will enable more dollars to flow to our Reform movement programs in Israel that educate and advocate for liberal Jewish and democratic values.

Though I’ve articulated some of what I said this morning in my Memoir, I want to say a few more words about it. I chose as the title “From the West to the East – A Memoir of a Liberal American Rabbi” based on a medieval poem by the 11th century rabbi, poet and philosopher, Yehuda Halevi, who lived most of his life in Muslim Spain and eventually made his way to the Land of Israel. He said famously: “Libi b’mizrach v’ani b’kitzei ma’arav – My heart is in the East and I’m at the edge of the West” thereby expressing the age-old longing of the Jewish people for Zion, a longing I’ve felt since I was a little boy as parts of both sides of my family made Aliyah – my mother’s side in 1878 and my father’s side in the mid-1930s.

My Memoir is organized around many events in my life including the intense blow-back I received to sermons I delivered and actions I took in San Francisco, here in D.C., and in Hollywood.

I write about many causes I took up in my life-long social justice activism and in my role as a past national chairman of the Association of Reform Zionists of America (ARZA), and as a national co-chair of the rabbinic and cantorial cabinet at J Street.

I have a number of important mentors about whom I’ve written who have come from the Israeli political right, the American political left, the moderate-liberal center in both the American Jewish and Israeli Jewish communities. Each of their voices has guided me, and their voices inside my mind and heart often have been at odds with one another, pushing me one way and then another, always sowing doubt, but helping me to clarify my liberal American Jewish and Zionist moral values.

I write in my Memoir, for example, about a dramatic story at Congregation Sherith Israel in San Francisco in 1980 as a young 30-year old rabbi after I delivered a Rosh Hashanah sermon to a packed sanctuary stopping just short of calling for a Palestinian state alongside a secure Israel. A brawl almost broke out after the service when an Israeli leader of Tel Aviv’s right-wing Likud Party barged into a group of the synagogue’s leaders and took great exception to what I said.

I describe another dramatic story here in Washington, D.C. in 1987 after I delivered another High Holiday sermon and moral appeal for us to become a sanctuary synagogue on behalf of the 100,000-plus El Salvadoran refugees living in the nation’s capital, many of whom were being hunted by Salvadoran death squads, and how I was taken to task in the weeks following Rosh Hashanah by a group of Jewish advisors to then Vice President George H. W. Bush. However, I was supported by the former American Ambassador to El Salvador Robert White who told me to resist the pressure to recant what I said in that sermon that he told me was 100 percent accurate.

I told the story in 2012 about my then 32-year policy of not officiating at inter-faith weddings and then changing that policy and announcing it on Rosh Hashanah morning resulting in a surprising standing ovation, and how my decision became for me an inflection point in my life and rabbinate and an inflection point for my congregation with congregants crying in the halls and parking lot for weeks afterwards. As only one example, a good friend, an African American actor married to a Jewish woman, came to me immediately after the service before I even left the bimah and said: “John, I’ve always felt welcome here, but now I consider Temple Israel of Hollywood my home.”

I wrote in some detail as well about contemporary antisemitism, anti-Zionism, and anti-Israel sentiment and what it means to raise proudly identifying young Jews today to assure the future of liberal American Jewry and our positive relationship to the people and State of Israel.

I wrote about my cancer diagnosis 15 years ago, the overwhelming loving response of my congregation to me, my coping with what I believed initially was a death sentence thanks to the brutal way my first physician informed me of my condition, and of the pain I suffered during my recovery from surgery, radiation treatment, and a staph infection, and how the experience changed me and made me far more empathic than I had ever been before to those confronting life-threatening illness and chronic pain.

I share how we liberal Jews might refocus our faith away from the traditional God-King and narrow idea about God that comes to us from tradition – especially the God Who doles out rewards and punishments – a classic image in the Hebrew Bible and rabbinic tradition, but instead embrace a mystic model that asks not “Do I believe in God” but rather “How might I best experience myself as a spiritual being?” based on my life-long study of Jewish mysticism and the thought and writings of such luminaries as Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel.

And I wrote about the difference between optimism and hope, that hope is an attitude of the heart and a mindset that helps people endure even the most negative and destructive challenges without denying that reality around us, and what transpired at my family Seder a dozen years ago in which my millennial sons challenged me given their pessimistic and, at times, cynical understanding of contemporary American, Israeli and world events.

I wrote this Memoir first and foremost for them, my children and grandchildren, that they might know more about who their father and grandfather was in this fractious and troubled era of Jewish, Israeli and human history; but I believe that what I’ve written is relevant for the large non-orthodox American Jewish community and many outside our Jewish tent.

My father died when I was 9 years-old, and other than a group of letters he wrote to his cousins in Philadelphia during his period of service as a Navy physician during WWII in Hawaii and on the Midway Atoll, I have nothing from his hand communicating to me who he was, what he most valued and believed as an American Jew living in the first half of the 20th century, or any details about his parents and grandparents and their immigration to America in the closing years of the 19th century. Not having his reflections and beliefs have been for me a large missing piece in the greater puzzle of my family’s life, and I didn’t want my grandchildren and their children to have no record of what I’ve experienced, cared about, valued and learned that might be of use and importance to them.

When I served my congregation in Hollywood, I met with every family a year before each bar and bat mitzvah celebration, and I urged the pre-b’nai mitzvah young people to research with their oldest living relatives their life stories. I gave them a list of 40 questions to ask those family elders. Doing so became for the young people and their parents an enriched experience that offered them greater appreciation for the life-experiences of the oldest surviving members in their families and a larger context for their lives. If you’ve not done so yourself in writing, audial or video, I urge you to consider it. To have such a record will preserve your memories and lives for the generations to come.

I’d be happy to share with you that list of 40 questions if you email me. Simply respond to this blog with your email address and I’ll send you a copy.

Finally, I hope you will acquire a copy of my Memoir for yourselves, your adult children, grandchildren and friends, whether they be Jewish, Christian, Muslim, Buddhist, Hindi, or without a faith tradition who are open to expanding how they think about their lives in this era and what possibilities this period in our history holds for each of us and the Jewish people.

At Last – The Hostages are Returning to their Families

20 Monday Jan 2025

Posted by rabbijohnrosove in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

gaza, hamas, Israel, palestine, politics

I have waited until the first group of hostages is home to express my joy in the agreement that brings about a ceasefire, the return of the hostages, and increased humanitarian aid into Gaza. At last, I’m beginning to feel a measure of relief that the first three Israeli hostages – Emily Damari, Romi Gonen and Doron Steinbrecher – are home after their 471 days of captivity and that the remainder of the hostages will be home soon. According to the agreement, 30 more hostages will be released during the first phase of the agreement in groups every Saturday over the next six weeks. In the next phase, more hostages will be released.

The greatest of all commandments in Jewish tradition is the “pidyon shevuyim – redemption of captives” (Maimonides, Mishnah Torah, Hilchot Matanot Aniyim 8:10-11). The Shulchan Aruch, the authoritative 16th century code of Jewish law, emphasizes that “every moment that one delays in freeing captives, in cases where it is possible to expedite their freedom, is considered to be tantamount to murder.” (Yoreh De’ah 252:3) Three millennia ago, the Psalmist exclaimed “B’shuv Adonai et shivat Zion hayinu k’cholmim… – When God returns the captives to Zion we will be like dreamers — our mouths will be filled with laughter and our tongues with joy.” (126:1)

Hamas’ kidnapping on October 7th 250+ babies, children, young women, men, and seniors from their beds and the music festival, and viciously raped many of the young women, paraded both the living and dead through the streets of Gaza like trophies to the cheering of the crowds, are unforgivable crimes against humanity. Worry about the fate and well-being of these hostages has been a constant every-day reality for Israelis and the Jewish people worldwide. The suffering too of innocent Palestinian civilians at the hands of Hamas’ criminality has been also a deep concern over all this time for compassionate human beings everywhere. Now, at last, the suffering can begin to end and Israelis and Palestinians can start to move on, to reconstruct their destroyed and damaged communities, to heal from this longest war, and consider paths towards peace with justice and security for both our peoples in our shared Homeland.

As a Jew and as an American, I’m grateful for the Biden Administration’s consistent effort to find a diplomatic resolution that brings about a ceasefire and the return home of the hostages. Credit is due as well to the incoming Administration that worked with Biden to achieve this agreement.

As much as we Jews are thrilled that the first small group of hostages are home and more are scheduled to be reunited with their families in the coming weeks, there is something repulsive and morally offensive to me that these innocent and peaceful men, women, children, babies, parents, and grandparents will be returned in exchange for the release of those terrorists who committed cruel acts against our people, who have much Jewish blood on their hands, or who profess the murderous Hamas intentions towards the Jewish people and Jewish State. I comfort myself, however, in the knowledge of and respect for Jewish tradition that insists that we do everything possible to bring home innocent captives and not leave them to a certain fate of death in the tunnels of Gaza.

I’m guardedly optimistic that all the hostages will be home soon and that peace will settle in the land. Until that happens, it is upon us to remember that despair is not an option, that hopeful aspirations have historically characterized the Jewish people regardless of our circumstances, and that our dreams of the return of the captives will be fulfilled and that peace and security will eventually come.

The Threat Assessment Against Israeli Democracy

31 Tuesday Dec 2024

Posted by rabbijohnrosove in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

benjamin-netanyahu, gaza, Israel, palestine, politics

Orly Erez-Likhovski, the Director of the Israeli Religious Action Center (IRAC – the social justice arm of Israel’s Reform Jewish Movement), several weeks ago offered a power-point threat assessment on Israeli democracy by the most extreme right-wing Israeli government in the history of the state. Orly spoke to those of us on the International Advisory Council for the Israel Movement for Reform Judaism and gave me permission to post what she said. I added language only for the purpose of clarification.

Orly is a brilliant Israeli and American lawyer who has brought about significant legal achievements in Israel including making illegal gender segregation on public transportation, ending the Orthodox monopoly on state-funded salaries to rabbis, filing (and winning) the first ever class action suit regarding exclusion of and humiliating practices against women in Israeli society, and disqualifying racist candidates from running for seats in Israel’s Knesset (Parliament).

Orly cited the important work of Kim Lane Scheppele, an American scholar of law and politics at Princeton University, who describes 8 means to dismantle liberal democracies from within and cement authoritarian rule. Scheppele has studied Turkey, Hungary, and the United States (see her essay – “Autocratic Legalism” in The University of Chicago Law Review – https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/print-archive/autocratic-legalism). Orly suggests that Scheppele’s analysis is applicable to what is taking place in Israel today:

  1. Winning democratic elections followed by an attack against democratic institutions (e.g. the judiciary, the media, the prosecutor’s office, the tax authority, and the election commission);
  2. Dismantling the mechanisms that restrict the ruling government;
  3. Controlling the Parliament through intimidation of its members thereby turning it to irrelevance as an independent government branch;
  4. Subordinating the courts to the government through so-called “reforms”;
  5. Gaining control over media outlets and spreading “fake news”;
  6. Placing loyalists in key positions throughout the government and in the media; 
  7. Delegitimizing opponents of the government by calling them traitors;
  8. Changing election laws to ensure future victory.

Introductory notes:

Understanding Israeli politics, political parties, and Israel’s “parliamentary democratic government” is challenging because there is no rigid constitution in Israel, though there have been continuous efforts to write one since the earliest years of the state. Many laws still on the books are founded upon Ottoman and British Mandate law that were in use before the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948. To take the place of a written constitution, Israel passed since 1950 fourteen “Basic Laws” (i.e.  laws which are supposed to be of a higher status than regular laws but in fact can be enacted and changed like any other law). Most of these laws deal with the various branches of government. Two basic laws constitute Israel’s “Bill of Rights” but again – they can be changed by a simple majority in the Knesset. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_Laws_of_Israel).

Here is Orly’s power-point presentation:

Israeli democracy is already weak and vulnerable:

  • There are no checks on the power of the Israeli government, except by the courts.
  • Israel’s separation of powers is thin since the government controls the Knesset through its coalition majority (i.e. the current extreme right-wing government has 68 Members out of a total of 120 MKs (57 percent).

There are no democratic mechanisms of checks and balances in Israel that exist in other democratic countries:

  • No 2 houses of parliament;
  • No regional elections;
  • No federal system;
  • No presidential veto power;
  • No international courts that the government must adhere to.

The right-wing Israeli government’s narrative and the assault on the courts:

  • The current right-wing government advocates against the independence of the Supreme Court claiming the Supreme Court is too active in striking down laws and government decisions, thereby preventing the elected government from implementing the will of the people.
  • The reality is that only 24 laws have been struck down by Israel’s Supreme Court in the past 30 years. The Supreme court is exceptionally cautious and will intervene only in exceptional circumstances.
  • The claim that the courts do not allow the government to implement the will of the majority disregards 2 critical characteristics of a democracy: the separation of powers and the protection of human rights, especially minority rights.

2023 – The “Judicial Coup”:

  • In December 2022, the government, led by PM Benjamin Netanyahu, took power.
  • In January 2023, the government’s Justice Minister and Deputy Prime Minister Yariv Levin announced the intention of passing a series of laws dramatically weakening Israel’s democracy, especially in limiting the government’s Judicial Review in the following ways:
  1. Taking away the Supreme Court’s ability to strike down Basic Laws that conflict with Israel’s democratic principles (meaning, any law could be shielded from judicial review simply by giving it the title “Basic Law”).
  2. Severely limiting the Supreme Court’s ability to strike down “regular” laws.
  3. Giving the Knesset the power to override a court decision and reenact a law that previously had been struck down by the Supreme Court.

Changing the process of nominating judges:

  • Today, to assure non-partisan balance, new judges are nominated by a committee comprised of 3 Supreme Court Justices, 2 Government Ministers, 2 Members of Knesset, and 2 lawyers. 7 of the 9 members of the committee are required to nominate a Supreme Court Justice. The Chief Justice of the Supreme court is nominated by a majority of the above and traditionally the most senior justice has been chosen to be Chief Justice.
  • However, the “Judicial Coup” aims to give the ruling coalition complete control over the judicial selection committee that would include 3 politically appointed ministers, 3 government coalition MKs, 3 justices, 2 opposition MKs, and for any nomination, 6 out of 11 majority would suffice.

The Attorney General (AG) and Legal Advisors of Government Ministries:

  • Currently, the AG is nominated by a professional selection committee. The AG is the ultimate authority regarding the legality of governmental actions. The AG’s opinion about the legality of the government’s actions binds the government. The AG represents the government in the courts. The same is true about legal advisors to the government ministries who are all subordinated to the AG and not to government ministers.
  • The “Judicial Coup” would allow the government to disregard the legal opinions of the AG and of legal advisors altogether and to choose a private lawyer to represent the government in court.

The “Reasonableness Doctrine”:

  • The Supreme Court can intervene in administrative decisions judged “unreasonable” (i.e. arbitrary, capricious, having bias, and showing conflict of interest). The Supreme Court rarely rules that a government decision is “unreasonable” (averaging only 1.6 times/year since 1995).
  • The “Judicial Coup” intended to prevent the Supreme Court from declaring any governmental or ministerial decision “unreasonable”.

What happened to the “Judicial Coup” legislation?

  • Before October 7, 2023, due to the unprecedented nearly year-long public protests of hundreds of thousands of Israelis across political parties and religious streams, all but one of the components of the “Judicial Coup” legislation failed to become law. The only component of the “Judicial Coup” legislation that the Knesset approved (in July 2023) is abolishing the “Reasonableness Doctrine”.
  • However, in January 2024, the Supreme Court struck down this law that abolished the “Reasonableness Doctrine” (sitting for the first time in Israel’s history in a full panel of 15 judges – suggesting how important the Supreme Court Justices understood this government action to be). This was also the first time the Supreme Court ever struck down a Basic Law. It did so on the grounds that the government’s action contradicts fundamental values in Israeli democracy (i.e. separation of powers and the rule of law).

The current government continues to promote a “Judicial/Regime Coup” post-October 7 – Why change the law if we can ignore it?

  • Court packing – Since October 2023, 3 liberal justices (of the total of 15 Supreme Court Justices) retired at the mandatory retirement age of 70. The right-wing Justice Minister Yariv Levin refuses to convene the judicial selection committee to nominate 3 new justices because he does not have the votes to appoint the right-wing judges that he wants.
  • Chief Justice of the Supreme Court – Justice Minister Levin refuses to follow the seniority rule and to obey court orders that have called for the appointment of a new Chief Justice, for the same reason above. The most senior judge who would become Chief Justice is a liberal, and Levin, consequently, has refused to act. For the first time in Israeli history, Israel has an interim Chief Justice.
  • Ethics of Judges – There is an attempt to have the Knesset nominate a Commissioner in charge of judges’ ethics, thus providing for the political removal of judges.

The Attorney General (AG):

  • The government wants to disregard the AG’s opinions. For example, ignoring the Supreme Court ruling regarding the draft requirement of Ultra-Orthodox Jews to serve in the army or the illegality of providing State subsidies to Ultra-Orthodox men who avoid army service.
  • The government employs a private attorney to represent it in the courts thereby side-lining the AG altogether.
  • There has been intensive incitement and threats against the AG (Gali Baharav-Miara), who was appointed in 2022 by former Prime Minister Naftali Bennett and Justice Minister Gideon Saar. She has been summoned by extremists in the current government to a government “hearing” and there are numerous right-wing calls for her to be fired simply for doing her job and upholding the law (although the government lacks the authority to do so).
  • The current government passed a law to force senior legal advisors to government ministries to retire, thus enabling it to appoint legal advisors who will act as “yes-men”.

Politicization of the Police:

  • National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir is a racist follower of the late Rabbi Meir Kahane. In a democracy, there should be a high wall between government ministers and the professional operation of the police. Ben Gvir has crashed that wall, and he intervenes regularly in police work (e.g. investigations, arrests, and nominations that include promoting violent officers).
  • There is selective enforcement of laws – harsh treatment of anti-government protesters as opposed to lenient treatment of extreme right-wing violence against Palestinians.
  • There is a petition pending before the Supreme Court challenging the law that allows the minister to intervene in police investigations.

Attack on Academia:

  • A bill is being presented to the Knesset that would force universities to fire professors based on expressions of “supporting terror,” but without due process, thus enabling political persecution without having to bring evidence or secure a conviction.
  • Universities that fail to fire such professors will be denied state funding.
  • A similar law regarding teachers in schools was already approved.
  • The person in charge of enforcing this law would be the government’s right-wing Education Minister Yoav Kisch, thereby dramatically restricting free speech.

Attack on the Media:

  • The right-wing government is presenting favorable regulation of pro-government TV stations such as Channel 14 (Israel’s equivalent of America’s “Fox News”).
  • The government strives to weaken media outlets critical of the government (e.g. the Public Broadcast Authority, Haaretz, and Galei Tzahal – the official radio station of Israel’s army).
  • The government is striving to turn regional radio stations (most privately owned by moguls connected to the government) into state-wide stations as a favor to owners.
  • The government is striving to change the rating system of media stations (as implemented by an independent, not-for-profit organization that measures viewership data to determine ratings for television channels and programs) to be controlled by the government.
  • After October 7, 2023, the government passed a law allowing the government’s Communications Minister to shut down media outlets – Al Jazeera was shut down in April 2024.
  • A new bill will grant the government more sweeping powers – allowing the government to shut down internet sites.

Bills against Palestinian Citizens of Israel:

  • A law is being proposed that will make it easier to disqualify Arab Political Parties and Arab candidates from running in elections for the Knesset thus ensuring a majority for the current right-wing government in future elections. Twenty percent of Israel’s total population is Palestinian-Israeli citizens. Only once was an Arab Political Party (Ra’am) part of a ruling Israeli government coalition (in 2021-2022). Eliminating Arab Parties from the Knesset would tip the balance of the total 120 Knesset members to right-wing control of the government. Israeli law requires that much evidence must be presented to support disqualifying a political party or a candidate on the basis of terrorism. This new law would only require bringing “one case” or “one statement” to disqualify said party or candidate, while in order to disqualify racist right-wing parties one would need to present a heavy case of evidence.
  • The government is striving to abolish the need for the state attorney’s approval of police investigations on incitement offenses. It is certainly legitimate to investigate support for Hamas’s attack against Israel on October 7, but it is another matter to investigate someone who publicly expresses concern for Palestinian well-being in Gaza as a consequence of the war. This law would have a chilling effect on Palestinian free speech in Israel. There is already selective enforcement for incitement offenses against Palestinians since October 7, 2023 and this would make the situation worse.
  • Efforts are being made to prevent the General Security Service from using administrative custody towards Jews accused of terrorism and allowing it only to be used against Palestinians accused of terrorism.

Additional Dangers:

  • Civil Service – changing the way the non-partisan Commissioner of Civil Service is nominated to gain governmental control over the nomination.
  • Bar Association – weakening the Israeli Bar Association in order to influence its representatives on the committee nominating judges.
  • Rabbis’ Law – adding hundreds of state paid rabbis, all of whom are Orthodox men chosen by the government, thereby deepening the Orthodox monopoly and discrimination against other non-Orthodox religious streams (e.g. Conservative, Reform, etc.).
  • Rabbinical Courts – promoting a bill that will give rabbinical courts jurisdiction over civil matters (currently they have jurisdiction only over matters of marriage and divorce), thereby promoting a theocracy over Israel’s democracy.
  • Military Draft – promoting a bill that will grant exemption from the military draft to Ultra-Orthodox Jews, contrary to Supreme Court decisions.
  • Settler Violence against Palestinians – extreme Jewish settlers’ violence against Palestinians under occupation in the West Bank which is not treated in an equivalent manner to Palestinian violence against Jewish settlers.
  • West Bank Status – the civil responsibility for the West Bank is being transferred from military officers to people affiliated with the extreme right-wing Finance Minster Betzalel Smotrich thus paving the way for de jure annexation of the West Bank into Israel.

What is IRAC (the Reform Movement’s Israel Religious Action Center) doing in the face of such dangers?

  • In the Knesset, our lawyers are attending committee meetings, filing position papers, and opposing dangerous bills that would harm Israeli democracy.
  • Our Israeli Reform movement is participating in public campaigns to raise awareness to all the above dangers.
  • We are working in cooperation with other Israeli NGOs and human rights organizations to create a stronger impact and effective messaging against all threats to Israel’s democracy.
  • We are protesting alongside hundreds of thousands of Israelis from across the religious streams and political parties who regard seriously the dangers posed against Israeli democracy by the current extremist government and refuse to be silent.
  • In appropriate cases we are challenging all the dangerous policies and laws in court.

We must remember the words of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. – “The ultimate tragedy is not the oppression and cruelty by the bad people, but the silence over that by the good people.”

We will not be silent but act to preserve Israel as a Jewish and democratic State.

Want to learn more? Sign up for IRAC’s weekly newsletter – the Pluralist!


 

UPHOLDING US LAW TO HOLD NETANYAHU ACCOUNTABLE IS PRO-ISRAEL

08 Sunday Dec 2024

Posted by rabbijohnrosove in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

gaza, Human rights, Israel, palestine, politics

This blog was posted by J Street on Friday, December 6

By Rabbi John Rosove and Sam Berkman

We wish we weren’t here. We wish October 7 had never happened. We wish all the hostages were home and that all had survived. We wish thousands of Palestinians had not fallen victim in this terrible war. We wish the fighting would stop and Israelis and Palestinians could know freedom and security–peace. But that’s not where we are today.

As this devastating war rages on, it’s time to confront a hard truth: Supporting Israel doesn’t always mean unquestioning endorsement of its government’s actions or the automatic provision of foreign aid. True support sometimes requires breaking from convention. Simply supplying military assistance – without tackling the root causes of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict – may temporarily mask the symptoms for Israelis, but it won’t deliver lasting peace and security. 

Ignoring those deeper issues undermines the US-Israel relationship and risks the lives of Israelis and Palestinians alike—a reality we’ve seen tragically play out over the past year.

This was the context for the US Senate’s vote last month on a series of resolutions to disapprove certain arms sales to Israel—measures that were largely symbolic, as the deadline to block the sales had already passed. While the resolutions failed, as expected, the vote sent a clear message of dissent of how the Netanyahu government has conducted the war in Gaza, its disregard for US laws, and the Biden administration’s handling of the conflict.

Nearly 14 months into this war, over 100 hostages remain in Gaza. Israeli security experts – including Israel’s recently ousted Defense Minister – have said that continuing the war in Gaza serves no strategic purpose. Meanwhile, President Biden’s repeated appeals for Netanyahu to take stronger action on the humanitarian crisis in Gaza have largely gone unanswered. 

Israel has had no greater friend over the last year than President Joe Biden, a self-proclaimed Zionist. From visiting Israel during wartime to providing critical military aid and even moving US military personnel and equipment into the region, Biden has consistently demonstrated America’s unwavering support for Israel.

And what has this loyalty yielded? Reports suggest that Netanyahu’s government is closer to advancing plans for rebuilding Israeli settlements in Gaza than securing the return of the hostages. Even most Israelis believe it is more important to secure a hostage deal now than continue the war.

So what more can be done? How do we help those Israelis who desperately want to break the stalemate and end the war, bring home the hostages, stop the suffering in Gaza, and set forth on a path toward regional peace and stability?

The answers do not lie in the empty rhetoric offered by those who opposed the Senate resolutions. Paying lip service to platitudes of peace while giving Netanyahu and his extreme right-wing government carte blanche hardly seems like the course of action a good friend to Israel should take.

Last month’s vote revealed something important: Leveraging US law to promote a shift toward policies that benefit Israel’s long-term security is not anti-Israel—it is profoundly pro-Israel.

Nineteen senators, all pro-Israel, stood up for US law and for their principles in the face of the ongoing war and humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Among those who voted a symbolic ‘yes’ to disapprove the sales were the second-highest ranking Democrat–the Senate Majority Whip, four Democratic leaders, the incoming ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and Hillary Clinton’s 2016 vice presidential running mate. Notably, three of these senators are Jewish. 

All 19 senators have long condemned Hamas and the horrific October 7 attack and reaffirmed Israel’s right to defend itself. They have called for the release of all hostages. They have voted for tens of billions of dollars of security aid to Israel throughout their careers. None of them are calling for anything approaching an arms embargo, and all of them endorse continued support for Iron Dome and other defensive systems.

Such resumes do not reflect an anti-Israel fringe. These are serious lawmakers who represent mainstream positions, including those within the American Jewish community– a recent poll of Jewish American voters found that 62 percent support withholding certain offensive arms to press for a ceasefire and hostage deal.

The positions taken by these courageous senators, which were couched in the spirit of supporting Israel, challenge traditional thinking in American politics and within the American Jewish community. But it is precisely this strategy we must embrace if we are committed to a future where Israel remains secure, vibrant, democratic, and Jewish, living in peace with its neighbors. 

We applaud these legislators, and we will continue to push for an Israel that reflects our highest Jewish and democratic values—and for US policies that champion this vision.

Doing this is many things: It’s American. It’s democratic. It’s Jewish. It’s pro-Palestinian. It’s pro-peace. It’s pro-Israel.

Upholding US Law to Hold Netanyahu Accountable is Pro-Israel
← Older posts
Newer posts →

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 363 other subscribers

Archive

  • August 2026 (1)
  • July 2026 (4)
  • June 2026 (3)
  • April 2026 (4)
  • March 2026 (6)
  • February 2026 (6)
  • January 2026 (8)
  • December 2025 (4)
  • November 2025 (6)
  • October 2025 (8)
  • September 2025 (3)
  • August 2025 (6)
  • July 2025 (4)
  • June 2025 (5)
  • May 2025 (4)
  • April 2025 (6)
  • March 2025 (8)
  • February 2025 (4)
  • January 2025 (8)
  • December 2024 (5)
  • November 2024 (5)
  • October 2024 (3)
  • September 2024 (7)
  • August 2024 (5)
  • July 2024 (7)
  • June 2024 (5)
  • May 2024 (5)
  • April 2024 (4)
  • March 2024 (8)
  • February 2024 (6)
  • January 2024 (5)
  • December 2023 (4)
  • November 2023 (4)
  • October 2023 (9)
  • September 2023 (8)
  • August 2023 (8)
  • July 2023 (10)
  • June 2023 (7)
  • May 2023 (6)
  • April 2023 (8)
  • March 2023 (5)
  • February 2023 (9)
  • January 2023 (8)
  • December 2022 (10)
  • November 2022 (5)
  • October 2022 (5)
  • September 2022 (10)
  • August 2022 (8)
  • July 2022 (8)
  • June 2022 (5)
  • May 2022 (6)
  • April 2022 (8)
  • March 2022 (11)
  • February 2022 (3)
  • January 2022 (7)
  • December 2021 (6)
  • November 2021 (9)
  • October 2021 (8)
  • September 2021 (6)
  • August 2021 (7)
  • July 2021 (7)
  • June 2021 (6)
  • May 2021 (11)
  • April 2021 (4)
  • March 2021 (9)
  • February 2021 (9)
  • January 2021 (14)
  • December 2020 (5)
  • November 2020 (12)
  • October 2020 (13)
  • September 2020 (17)
  • August 2020 (8)
  • July 2020 (8)
  • June 2020 (8)
  • May 2020 (8)
  • April 2020 (11)
  • March 2020 (13)
  • February 2020 (13)
  • January 2020 (15)
  • December 2019 (11)
  • November 2019 (9)
  • October 2019 (5)
  • September 2019 (10)
  • August 2019 (9)
  • July 2019 (8)
  • June 2019 (12)
  • May 2019 (9)
  • April 2019 (9)
  • March 2019 (16)
  • February 2019 (9)
  • January 2019 (19)
  • December 2018 (19)
  • November 2018 (9)
  • October 2018 (17)
  • September 2018 (12)
  • August 2018 (11)
  • July 2018 (10)
  • June 2018 (16)
  • May 2018 (15)
  • April 2018 (18)
  • March 2018 (8)
  • February 2018 (11)
  • January 2018 (10)
  • December 2017 (6)
  • November 2017 (12)
  • October 2017 (8)
  • September 2017 (17)
  • August 2017 (10)
  • July 2017 (10)
  • June 2017 (12)
  • May 2017 (11)
  • April 2017 (12)
  • March 2017 (10)
  • February 2017 (14)
  • January 2017 (22)
  • December 2016 (13)
  • November 2016 (12)
  • October 2016 (8)
  • September 2016 (6)
  • August 2016 (6)
  • July 2016 (10)
  • June 2016 (10)
  • May 2016 (11)
  • April 2016 (13)
  • March 2016 (10)
  • February 2016 (11)
  • January 2016 (9)
  • December 2015 (10)
  • November 2015 (12)
  • October 2015 (8)
  • September 2015 (7)
  • August 2015 (10)
  • July 2015 (7)
  • June 2015 (8)
  • May 2015 (10)
  • April 2015 (9)
  • March 2015 (12)
  • February 2015 (10)
  • January 2015 (12)
  • December 2014 (7)
  • November 2014 (13)
  • October 2014 (9)
  • September 2014 (8)
  • August 2014 (11)
  • July 2014 (10)
  • June 2014 (13)
  • May 2014 (9)
  • April 2014 (17)
  • March 2014 (9)
  • February 2014 (12)
  • January 2014 (15)
  • December 2013 (13)
  • November 2013 (16)
  • October 2013 (7)
  • September 2013 (8)
  • August 2013 (12)
  • July 2013 (8)
  • June 2013 (11)
  • May 2013 (11)
  • April 2013 (12)
  • March 2013 (11)
  • February 2013 (6)
  • January 2013 (9)
  • December 2012 (12)
  • November 2012 (11)
  • October 2012 (6)
  • September 2012 (11)
  • August 2012 (8)
  • July 2012 (11)
  • June 2012 (10)
  • May 2012 (11)
  • April 2012 (13)
  • March 2012 (10)
  • February 2012 (9)
  • January 2012 (14)
  • December 2011 (16)
  • November 2011 (23)
  • October 2011 (21)
  • September 2011 (19)
  • August 2011 (31)
  • July 2011 (8)

Categories

  • American Jewish Life (458)
  • American Politics and Life (417)
  • Art (30)
  • Beauty in Nature (24)
  • Book Recommendations (52)
  • Divrei Torah (159)
  • Ethics (490)
  • Film Reviews (6)
  • Health and Well-Being (156)
  • Holidays (136)
  • Human rights (57)
  • Inuyim – Prayer reflections and ruminations (95)
  • Israel and Palestine (358)
  • Israel/Zionism (502)
  • Jewish History (441)
  • Jewish Identity (372)
  • Jewish-Christian Relations (51)
  • Jewish-Islamic Relations (57)
  • Life Cycle (53)
  • Musings about God/Faith/Religious life (190)
  • Poetry (86)
  • Quote of the Day (101)
  • Social Justice (355)
  • Stories (74)
  • Tributes (30)
  • Uncategorized (851)
  • Women's Rights (152)

Blogroll

  • Americans for Peace Now
  • Association of Reform Zionists of America (ARZA)
  • Congregation Darchei Noam
  • Haaretz
  • J Street
  • Jerusalem Post
  • Jerusalem Report
  • Kehillat Mevesseret Zion
  • Temple Israel of Hollywood
  • The IRAC
  • The Jewish Daily Forward
  • The LA Jewish Journal
  • The RAC
  • URJ
  • World Union for Progressive Judaism

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Rabbi John Rosove's Blog
    • Join 363 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Rabbi John Rosove's Blog
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar